Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Horus reticle, Good, Bad, Ugly
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bruce_ventura" data-source="post: 834026" data-attributes="member: 34084"><p>I use a Bushnell 3.5-21x50 with a Horus reticle for ballistic testing. A Horus reticle is essential for the type of testing I do. I would not use a Horus reticle for hunting, however. I think it's too large and busy, and makes it difficult to spot hits in anything but dry, dusty terrain. </p><p></p><p>I like the concept, though. Another reticle that is mil-based, has useful holdoff marks and obscures less of the target is the Swarovski BRX/BRH. I plan to use a Z5 3-18x44 with the BRH reticle this deer season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bruce_ventura, post: 834026, member: 34084"] I use a Bushnell 3.5-21x50 with a Horus reticle for ballistic testing. A Horus reticle is essential for the type of testing I do. I would not use a Horus reticle for hunting, however. I think it's too large and busy, and makes it difficult to spot hits in anything but dry, dusty terrain. I like the concept, though. Another reticle that is mil-based, has useful holdoff marks and obscures less of the target is the Swarovski BRX/BRH. I plan to use a Z5 3-18x44 with the BRH reticle this deer season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Horus reticle, Good, Bad, Ugly
Top