Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hornady Concentricity Gauges?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nheninge" data-source="post: 421928" data-attributes="member: 13085"><p>Nice post woods! Maybe the rain/weather is getting to me, but I generally look forward to the challenge of shooting in adverse conditions. It is what separates the men from the boys!</p><p></p><p>I guess I kind of felt attacked by certain "members" disrespecting other LRH'ers posting of opinions and conjecture or Shakespearean soliloquy or (hardly) abstract philosophical dissertation. I can certainly verify that 95% of what is posted on this (or any website) is just opinion. Interpret it as you will. Enjoy the social aspects. It is what we are all passionate about. It is why I am sitting at my computer right now. I love all the opinions, witty banter, and conjecture. Keep it coming. I learn from you guys every day. </p><p></p><p>But... I have seen very little "data" or even "field reports" that would stand up to even the most basic statistical test. Not to knock your work Woods (I'm with you), but, maybe you just shot better in the second group! This makes "your" conjecture more like fact and now people reading this post will think that the magic Hornady tool might/can shrink their groups. Maybe, maybe not. We all agree straighter ammo is likely to shoot smaller groups. However, if the members request data not based on "conjecture", then a statistical test is the only resolution. For members that don't understand the term conjecture, but use it in ignorance, I suggest wikipedia.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nheninge, post: 421928, member: 13085"] Nice post woods! Maybe the rain/weather is getting to me, but I generally look forward to the challenge of shooting in adverse conditions. It is what separates the men from the boys! I guess I kind of felt attacked by certain "members" disrespecting other LRH'ers posting of opinions and conjecture or Shakespearean soliloquy or (hardly) abstract philosophical dissertation. I can certainly verify that 95% of what is posted on this (or any website) is just opinion. Interpret it as you will. Enjoy the social aspects. It is what we are all passionate about. It is why I am sitting at my computer right now. I love all the opinions, witty banter, and conjecture. Keep it coming. I learn from you guys every day. But... I have seen very little "data" or even "field reports" that would stand up to even the most basic statistical test. Not to knock your work Woods (I'm with you), but, maybe you just shot better in the second group! This makes "your" conjecture more like fact and now people reading this post will think that the magic Hornady tool might/can shrink their groups. Maybe, maybe not. We all agree straighter ammo is likely to shoot smaller groups. However, if the members request data not based on "conjecture", then a statistical test is the only resolution. For members that don't understand the term conjecture, but use it in ignorance, I suggest wikipedia. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Hornady Concentricity Gauges?
Top