Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Hornady at it again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="entoptics" data-source="post: 3011616" data-attributes="member: 104268"><p>This is used as justification in every 3 shot group debate, but is actually just the opposite and justification for larger groups, and the reason is right there in your post..."Repeatable". </p><p></p><p>By definition, that's a 6 shot group at minimum (and I'd hope at least 15 before you grab your jerky and lace up your boots).</p><p></p><p>The "3 shots are all I'll ever shoot at game" crowd are still shooting 6 or 9 or 18 or 24 shot groups, but doing it on multiple targets. That's fine, but it can make the results harder to interpret.</p><p></p><p>More importantly, it also leaves a lot more room for the mistake of subjectively interpreting a statistically meaningless sub-sample of your repeats as "good" or "bad" and thus disregarding data.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="entoptics, post: 3011616, member: 104268"] This is used as justification in every 3 shot group debate, but is actually just the opposite and justification for larger groups, and the reason is right there in your post..."Repeatable". By definition, that's a 6 shot group at minimum (and I'd hope at least 15 before you grab your jerky and lace up your boots). The "3 shots are all I'll ever shoot at game" crowd are still shooting 6 or 9 or 18 or 24 shot groups, but doing it on multiple targets. That's fine, but it can make the results harder to interpret. More importantly, it also leaves a lot more room for the mistake of subjectively interpreting a statistically meaningless sub-sample of your repeats as "good" or "bad" and thus disregarding data. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Hornady at it again
Top