Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
Hogs in Texas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Double Naught Spy" data-source="post: 1330203" data-attributes="member: 55410"><p>From the article, you would think the only cause of mange is notoedric mange. Sarcoptic mange is an introduced Old World mange that was hoped to kill off the wolf populations. It didn't and has spread across the US. It has been documented with population decline, until the population stabilizes.</p><p></p><p>Going back to the fraud issue, I wonder if the Captain considers it fraud to charge hunters for hunting deer and to claim insurance for deer damage as well. I do respect that it is his opinion, but find it outlandish in that his definition of fraud doesn't fit with any sort of legal or insurance definition of fraud. In other words, the folks that regularly work with the concept and deal with its ramifications, and those most potentially hurt by it (insurance companies), don't consider it to be fraud, so it really isn't. It could be considered potentially unethical, maybe immoral, but not illegal and fraud in this case, would be illegal if it was fraud, which it apparently isn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Double Naught Spy, post: 1330203, member: 55410"] From the article, you would think the only cause of mange is notoedric mange. Sarcoptic mange is an introduced Old World mange that was hoped to kill off the wolf populations. It didn't and has spread across the US. It has been documented with population decline, until the population stabilizes. Going back to the fraud issue, I wonder if the Captain considers it fraud to charge hunters for hunting deer and to claim insurance for deer damage as well. I do respect that it is his opinion, but find it outlandish in that his definition of fraud doesn't fit with any sort of legal or insurance definition of fraud. In other words, the folks that regularly work with the concept and deal with its ramifications, and those most potentially hurt by it (insurance companies), don't consider it to be fraud, so it really isn't. It could be considered potentially unethical, maybe immoral, but not illegal and fraud in this case, would be illegal if it was fraud, which it apparently isn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Hog Hunting
Hogs in Texas
Top