Henson Aluminum tipped bullets test
- Thread starter goodgrouper
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Roll-Yur-Own
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 795
No, its definitely lower. Sierra bullets, Berger Bullets, Bob Cauterucio, and Don Gentner all use standard boattails.
What RBT bullets did the army use?
What RBT bullets did the army use?
I had thought that the RBT was better because the muzzle blast would not flow past the rebated section and therefore the bullet would be less affected.
If this is true, then both sides could be right, depending how much the blast changes velocity and stabilization.
edge.
If this is true, then both sides could be right, depending how much the blast changes velocity and stabilization.
edge.
Roll-Yur-Own
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 795
I don't know about the muzzle blast. I'm only speaking from a design standpoint and comparing at identical velocities. Interesting point.
But, I also find it interesting the the only companies offering this seem to be the one's buying dies from Corbin. I did a search of Rebated Boat Tails and only Corbin's article a couple of one-man type companies using this design.
The information all seems to stem from Corbin. I spoke to Bob Cauterucio about this and he said it wasn't as good as standard boattails and it had been tried 20 or 30 years ago.
But, I also find it interesting the the only companies offering this seem to be the one's buying dies from Corbin. I did a search of Rebated Boat Tails and only Corbin's article a couple of one-man type companies using this design.
The information all seems to stem from Corbin. I spoke to Bob Cauterucio about this and he said it wasn't as good as standard boattails and it had been tried 20 or 30 years ago.
Last edited:
Mikecr
Well-Known Member
Base drag is definitely higher with RBT bullets due to turbulent flow brought on sooner.
But there are both pros/cons to this.
Higher base drag improves stability by pulling center of pressure back closer to center of gravity. With this, a bullet with a very long aluminum tipped nose might still be stable where it wouldn't with a standard 9deg boat tail.
Higher base drag combines with overall drag to reduce BC. Even with reduced wave drag from a very pointy tip(in this case), BC would still likely end up lower.
RBT's might have the potential for better muzzle release. Not as good as flat base, but better than BTs..
I see alot of experimenting here with tips and tails, but I doubt any will produce better bullets than we already have.
And the reason I say this; None of it is new..
But there are both pros/cons to this.
Higher base drag improves stability by pulling center of pressure back closer to center of gravity. With this, a bullet with a very long aluminum tipped nose might still be stable where it wouldn't with a standard 9deg boat tail.
Higher base drag combines with overall drag to reduce BC. Even with reduced wave drag from a very pointy tip(in this case), BC would still likely end up lower.
RBT's might have the potential for better muzzle release. Not as good as flat base, but better than BTs..
I see alot of experimenting here with tips and tails, but I doubt any will produce better bullets than we already have.
And the reason I say this; None of it is new..
Last edited:
I do not know, as I said that is what I was told. The person claimed to have been at the Aberdeen Proving grounds and I thought that he knew what he was talking about, apparently I was wrong
Roll-Yur-Own
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 795
Exactly Mike CR. The flat base stabilizes faster than the boattail so I would guess that the RBT's would fall in between flat base and boat tails.
I agree, as long as it is a jacketed bullet limited improvements can be made. As I mentioned earlier, I can make improved bullets in a solid, but they are useless for hunting. Maybe experimenting needs to be done with other materials. I've heard of talk about tungsten bullets but I never did anymore research.
I'll tell you guys about a project we did a few years ago for an ammo manufacture. We designed a 2 piece fifty cal bullet with a hollow core. The core was filled with some sort of explosive compound and the two pieces were pressed together. I don't know what is was since I only designed the bullet. Never got to see them shot but I heard it was pretty insane. Obviously, not a hunting bullet, but interesting never the less.
I agree, as long as it is a jacketed bullet limited improvements can be made. As I mentioned earlier, I can make improved bullets in a solid, but they are useless for hunting. Maybe experimenting needs to be done with other materials. I've heard of talk about tungsten bullets but I never did anymore research.
I'll tell you guys about a project we did a few years ago for an ammo manufacture. We designed a 2 piece fifty cal bullet with a hollow core. The core was filled with some sort of explosive compound and the two pieces were pressed together. I don't know what is was since I only designed the bullet. Never got to see them shot but I heard it was pretty insane. Obviously, not a hunting bullet, but interesting never the less.
Last edited:
Coues Sniper
Well-Known Member
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]You guys have truckloads more knowledge than myself on this subject, but this is an old rebated article I remembered seeing. (it's really old, but physics is physics)
"When a flat base bullet flys through the air at any velocity, it displaces an equal volume of air which then rushes in behind the passing bullet to fill the vacuum. This happens at any velocity. But at speeds below Mach I (speed of sound), the drag caused by this turbulence is greater than most of the other forces slowing down the bullet. When the sound barrier is crossed, the air is compressed faster than it can move out of the way, and it compacts into a dense wave that is dragged along by the nose of the bullet. Moving this compressed shock wave adsorbs far more energy than the turbulent base drag. Thus, at super-sonic speeds, the nose shape has a greater effect than the base shape on the total retardation of the bullet (as a
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]percentage of total drag). If the base of the bullet were made more streamlined, then the air would be put back together more smoothly, with less turbulence, and would fill the space left by the passing bullet more quickly. This would eliminate much of the base drag. Putting a point on both ends of the bullet accomplishes this, but it generally makes the bullet too long, so that it takes up too much powder space or causes other physical problems in a practical size cartridge case or gun. There is no technical reason why a double-ended bullet should not
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]be used to overcome drag, except for these physical considerations.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The next best idea is to use a truncated conical shape on the base, so that the bullet has some degree of streamlining to help reduce base turbulence. The conventional boattail does this reasonably well. By having a base that is made of an angled portion of the shank, the size of the flat base is reduced so that the turbulence works on a smaller area. A typical, practical size of boattail has from nine to fifteen degrees (measured from the center-line of the bullet) and is about a caliber long. There is no great difference in the performance of any specific angle or length within this general range. The boattail reduces base drag at all velocities, but has the greatest percentage of effect when the bullet is flying at sub-sonic velocity. Thus, it is more important for slow bullets, or bullets fired at long ranges, than for bullets which will be moving at super-sonic speed over their entire path to the target. Ideally, pistol bullets should be boattails. However, due to the length and weight limitations imposed on most pistol bullets, this superior design is rarely used for handguns. It is often applied to rifle designs where it will have relatively little effect, but is primarily effective for promotional purposes.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The conventional boattail bullet does have three problems associated with it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](1.) The angled boattail base tends to focus escaping muzzle gas like the nozzle of a hose, so that the gas flows in a laminar manner over the boattail, along the parallel shank, and partly attaches or follows the outline of the ogive until it separates at or near the tip, and breaks up into turbulence just ahead of the bullet. This can add as much as 15% to the total dispersion pattern of a given bullet design. The boattail bullet literally flys through its own muzzle blast because of the focusing effect of the streamlined base during the moment of exit from the barrel.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](2.) Since gas pressure acts normal to all surfaces (at 90-degrees), the compressive force of chamber and barrel pressure tends to compress the boattail section of the jacketed bullet inward, peeling it away from the bore and allowing gas to channel its way into the rifling grooves, causing gas cutting of the rifling edges and the edges of the rifling imposed on the bullet. Micro-droplets of melted jacket material can be observed on most boattail bullet jackets along the rifling edges, especially toward the rear of the bullet shank, some large enough to see without a magnifying aid. The flat based bullet tends to compress in length so that the shank is expanded into the rifling, for a superior seal.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](3.) The boattail bullet is sensitive to slight manufacturing variations in the position and concentric alignment of the boattail angle starting point. At the moment of exit from the bore, while the rifling is just losing contact with the shank diameter, any difference in position of the junction of the shank and the boattail gives a tremendous leverage to the escaping gas, which allows it to push the entire bullet in the direction of the higher starting point. That is, if the boattail is even slightly higher on one side of the bullet, the bullet will be deflected toward that side at the moment of exit by gas pressure escaping earlier from the opposite side.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]All three of these objections are overcome by using the Rebated Boattail design.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](1.) Hyper-velocity gas escaping around the bullet base at the muzzle will impinge upon the rebate shoulder, which acts as a "spoiler" and deflects the gas from a laminar pattern. It causes a ring of gas to be blow off in a turbulent forward rolling expansion, but leaves a clear space directly in front of the bullet. This eliminates the buffetting of the bullet by its own muzzle gas, a source of up to 15% of the total dispersion factor.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](2.) Gas pressure acting normal to the surface of the Rebated Boattail will compress it inward,
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]causing the lead to flow forward and outward. When the gas reaches the rebated area, it acts normal to this surface also, forcing the gas to act parallel to the bore rather than at a compressive angle, and holding the rebated edge rather than compressing it. Internal pressure from the compressed, angled base area then pushes the lead outward, against the inside of the jacket, which in turn seals against the bore more tightly.The peeling-away of the base from the bore is eliminated. An examination of fired RBT bullets at the same velocity and from the same guns as the BT design will show no micro-droplets of molten jacket along the rifling edges.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](3.) The Corbin method of producing the RBT design, using two dies and a finalizing punch during the point forming operation, greatly reduces or eliminates the chance of having the RBT angle start higher on one side than the other. In addition, if this should occur, the effect on dispersion is far less because of the vastly shorter transit time during which the gas can begin to escape around the emerging bullet base.The sudden drop in diameter releases the gas with smaller time/resistance factor than the slow increase as the BT angle passes the muzzle. Add to this the fact that the tooling lasts longer and is easier to produce in a precise manner, and you have every reason to abandon the BT in favor of the RBT."[/FONT]
"When a flat base bullet flys through the air at any velocity, it displaces an equal volume of air which then rushes in behind the passing bullet to fill the vacuum. This happens at any velocity. But at speeds below Mach I (speed of sound), the drag caused by this turbulence is greater than most of the other forces slowing down the bullet. When the sound barrier is crossed, the air is compressed faster than it can move out of the way, and it compacts into a dense wave that is dragged along by the nose of the bullet. Moving this compressed shock wave adsorbs far more energy than the turbulent base drag. Thus, at super-sonic speeds, the nose shape has a greater effect than the base shape on the total retardation of the bullet (as a
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]percentage of total drag). If the base of the bullet were made more streamlined, then the air would be put back together more smoothly, with less turbulence, and would fill the space left by the passing bullet more quickly. This would eliminate much of the base drag. Putting a point on both ends of the bullet accomplishes this, but it generally makes the bullet too long, so that it takes up too much powder space or causes other physical problems in a practical size cartridge case or gun. There is no technical reason why a double-ended bullet should not
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]be used to overcome drag, except for these physical considerations.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The next best idea is to use a truncated conical shape on the base, so that the bullet has some degree of streamlining to help reduce base turbulence. The conventional boattail does this reasonably well. By having a base that is made of an angled portion of the shank, the size of the flat base is reduced so that the turbulence works on a smaller area. A typical, practical size of boattail has from nine to fifteen degrees (measured from the center-line of the bullet) and is about a caliber long. There is no great difference in the performance of any specific angle or length within this general range. The boattail reduces base drag at all velocities, but has the greatest percentage of effect when the bullet is flying at sub-sonic velocity. Thus, it is more important for slow bullets, or bullets fired at long ranges, than for bullets which will be moving at super-sonic speed over their entire path to the target. Ideally, pistol bullets should be boattails. However, due to the length and weight limitations imposed on most pistol bullets, this superior design is rarely used for handguns. It is often applied to rifle designs where it will have relatively little effect, but is primarily effective for promotional purposes.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The conventional boattail bullet does have three problems associated with it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](1.) The angled boattail base tends to focus escaping muzzle gas like the nozzle of a hose, so that the gas flows in a laminar manner over the boattail, along the parallel shank, and partly attaches or follows the outline of the ogive until it separates at or near the tip, and breaks up into turbulence just ahead of the bullet. This can add as much as 15% to the total dispersion pattern of a given bullet design. The boattail bullet literally flys through its own muzzle blast because of the focusing effect of the streamlined base during the moment of exit from the barrel.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](2.) Since gas pressure acts normal to all surfaces (at 90-degrees), the compressive force of chamber and barrel pressure tends to compress the boattail section of the jacketed bullet inward, peeling it away from the bore and allowing gas to channel its way into the rifling grooves, causing gas cutting of the rifling edges and the edges of the rifling imposed on the bullet. Micro-droplets of melted jacket material can be observed on most boattail bullet jackets along the rifling edges, especially toward the rear of the bullet shank, some large enough to see without a magnifying aid. The flat based bullet tends to compress in length so that the shank is expanded into the rifling, for a superior seal.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](3.) The boattail bullet is sensitive to slight manufacturing variations in the position and concentric alignment of the boattail angle starting point. At the moment of exit from the bore, while the rifling is just losing contact with the shank diameter, any difference in position of the junction of the shank and the boattail gives a tremendous leverage to the escaping gas, which allows it to push the entire bullet in the direction of the higher starting point. That is, if the boattail is even slightly higher on one side of the bullet, the bullet will be deflected toward that side at the moment of exit by gas pressure escaping earlier from the opposite side.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]All three of these objections are overcome by using the Rebated Boattail design.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](1.) Hyper-velocity gas escaping around the bullet base at the muzzle will impinge upon the rebate shoulder, which acts as a "spoiler" and deflects the gas from a laminar pattern. It causes a ring of gas to be blow off in a turbulent forward rolling expansion, but leaves a clear space directly in front of the bullet. This eliminates the buffetting of the bullet by its own muzzle gas, a source of up to 15% of the total dispersion factor.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](2.) Gas pressure acting normal to the surface of the Rebated Boattail will compress it inward,
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]causing the lead to flow forward and outward. When the gas reaches the rebated area, it acts normal to this surface also, forcing the gas to act parallel to the bore rather than at a compressive angle, and holding the rebated edge rather than compressing it. Internal pressure from the compressed, angled base area then pushes the lead outward, against the inside of the jacket, which in turn seals against the bore more tightly.The peeling-away of the base from the bore is eliminated. An examination of fired RBT bullets at the same velocity and from the same guns as the BT design will show no micro-droplets of molten jacket along the rifling edges.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](3.) The Corbin method of producing the RBT design, using two dies and a finalizing punch during the point forming operation, greatly reduces or eliminates the chance of having the RBT angle start higher on one side than the other. In addition, if this should occur, the effect on dispersion is far less because of the vastly shorter transit time during which the gas can begin to escape around the emerging bullet base.The sudden drop in diameter releases the gas with smaller time/resistance factor than the slow increase as the BT angle passes the muzzle. Add to this the fact that the tooling lasts longer and is easier to produce in a precise manner, and you have every reason to abandon the BT in favor of the RBT."[/FONT]
Interesting debate about the rbbt v. bt v. fb bullets but all I want is a bullet that will hit where it is aimed and do enough damage to insure a clean kill. From the looks of the henson bullets tumbling at reduced velocities I think it would do the trick.
Even though it isnt a classic mushroom and doesnt grenade it seems that it would be sufficient. I know the length of those things is insane so even doubled over they have to leave an inch wide wound tract. I would think that even with a heart lung hit any animal shot with those things is dead on its feet. Sure you would have to track it for 30-40 yards most probably in a straight line until the animal became unconscious. I would also thing with a high shoulder hit you would get a DRT result. Am I wrong about it?
I dont take TX heart shots (no offense meant texans, I didnt coin the term) so in my way of thinking any penetration further than about 9 inches is a waste.
I guess my question is this, whats wrong with a bullet tumbling anyway? Seems to me it would create enough damage and have sufficient penetration to reliably let the air out of any animal I am likely to shoot; so long as it lands in a vital area. Even an accubond (which I really like) isnt going to do much better if your gut shooting them.
I guess I just tend to focus more on bullet placement than performance. IMO the only thing that makes a bullet unsuitable for hunting is that it blows apart before reaching the vitals or pencils through, I do not see either of these with the Henson bullets.......but then again I dont know much. I wonder how reliably they will tumble. As long as they tumbled on impact every time seems like they would work great, I dunno.
Even though it isnt a classic mushroom and doesnt grenade it seems that it would be sufficient. I know the length of those things is insane so even doubled over they have to leave an inch wide wound tract. I would think that even with a heart lung hit any animal shot with those things is dead on its feet. Sure you would have to track it for 30-40 yards most probably in a straight line until the animal became unconscious. I would also thing with a high shoulder hit you would get a DRT result. Am I wrong about it?
I dont take TX heart shots (no offense meant texans, I didnt coin the term) so in my way of thinking any penetration further than about 9 inches is a waste.
I guess my question is this, whats wrong with a bullet tumbling anyway? Seems to me it would create enough damage and have sufficient penetration to reliably let the air out of any animal I am likely to shoot; so long as it lands in a vital area. Even an accubond (which I really like) isnt going to do much better if your gut shooting them.
I guess I just tend to focus more on bullet placement than performance. IMO the only thing that makes a bullet unsuitable for hunting is that it blows apart before reaching the vitals or pencils through, I do not see either of these with the Henson bullets.......but then again I dont know much. I wonder how reliably they will tumble. As long as they tumbled on impact every time seems like they would work great, I dunno.
AJ Peacock
Well-Known Member
The big problem happens when a bullet hits a large bone (like an elk shoulder) and the bullet takes an abrupt left turn, without doing lethal damage. That's why you want straight line penetration. Bullet placement is paramount and you want to trust a bullet will penetrate STRAIGHT from it's point of impact.
AJ
AJ
Roll-Yur-Own
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 795
+1
You need a bullet that performs and not just hit the target.
You need a bullet that performs and not just hit the target.
Varminator 911
Well-Known Member
Inconclusive for me
I'm going to reserve my judgement of this bullet. Maybe it does have a design flaw. But a potentially unstable bullet into dry newspaper sounds like a recipe for turning a long bullet sideways. It's very difficult to penetrate dry newspaper. It's not "solid" like any kind of flesh, bone, or bodily fluid is to someting moving at 1800fps. Dry loose newspaper, even packed tight, moves too easily forward with the bullet. Dry phone books would be better because they are closer to being noncompressible like an animal. Wet phone books would be better yet. I'm just not going to use this as a basis for selecting my hunting bullets.
I'm going to reserve my judgement of this bullet. Maybe it does have a design flaw. But a potentially unstable bullet into dry newspaper sounds like a recipe for turning a long bullet sideways. It's very difficult to penetrate dry newspaper. It's not "solid" like any kind of flesh, bone, or bodily fluid is to someting moving at 1800fps. Dry loose newspaper, even packed tight, moves too easily forward with the bullet. Dry phone books would be better because they are closer to being noncompressible like an animal. Wet phone books would be better yet. I'm just not going to use this as a basis for selecting my hunting bullets.
royinidaho
Well-Known Member
GG,
Good test. Much was learned.
I've discovered a way to get more pigs. However, only the front half with no innards. It still should make a decent test.
When I get an extra I could pack it in ice and ups it down to ya.
Good test. Much was learned.
I've discovered a way to get more pigs. However, only the front half with no innards. It still should make a decent test.
When I get an extra I could pack it in ice and ups it down to ya.
