Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
HELP WITH SATERLEE VELOCITY TEST
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="asd9055" data-source="post: 1958291" data-attributes="member: 73445"><p>Many roads lead to Rome. Some will take you there faster and at a lower cost. (OCW (Dan Newberry), Satterllee, Variation of Ladder Test, Modelling first, combination of all or some, and always end up with the proof of the pudding, the final shots on target)</p><p>I don't need to know the precise physics why I stay on a bicycle, yet I am able to ride it to where I want to go.</p><p>Interior ballistics is a very complex subject of which I know very little. However, why the difference each time? Because each case is different, each primer is different and each bullet is different along with environmental factors. Some things you have no power over. You try to adjust the ones you do. I know however, if you use one of these methods I will get consistent groups on a target.</p><p>Do you truly want to know about nodes? Read Chris Long's OBT. You don't believe in it, no problem. Google FEA (Finite Element Analysis) of a rifle barrel.</p><p>Various people have experimented and developed methods of finding these nodes. Some are improvements or previous. Others are totally different, but they work. They just don't get there at the same time (number of shots)</p><p>Even your method, whether you like to admit it or not, I am willing to bet is a combination of OCW and some ladder variation. </p><p>Now, my main gripe. The OP asked for help of interpreting his data. You don't believe in what he is doing? no problem. No need to say anything.</p><p>It just never fails, someone will post asking about something and a few people out there will attack instead of help. Take time. Read and understand the post. If you have something positive to add, great. If you don't, no problem. You don't need to hear your self talk every time there is a post.</p><p>I am done with this post.</p><p></p><p>Good and Safe Shooting Everyone!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="asd9055, post: 1958291, member: 73445"] Many roads lead to Rome. Some will take you there faster and at a lower cost. (OCW (Dan Newberry), Satterllee, Variation of Ladder Test, Modelling first, combination of all or some, and always end up with the proof of the pudding, the final shots on target) I don't need to know the precise physics why I stay on a bicycle, yet I am able to ride it to where I want to go. Interior ballistics is a very complex subject of which I know very little. However, why the difference each time? Because each case is different, each primer is different and each bullet is different along with environmental factors. Some things you have no power over. You try to adjust the ones you do. I know however, if you use one of these methods I will get consistent groups on a target. Do you truly want to know about nodes? Read Chris Long's OBT. You don't believe in it, no problem. Google FEA (Finite Element Analysis) of a rifle barrel. Various people have experimented and developed methods of finding these nodes. Some are improvements or previous. Others are totally different, but they work. They just don't get there at the same time (number of shots) Even your method, whether you like to admit it or not, I am willing to bet is a combination of OCW and some ladder variation. Now, my main gripe. The OP asked for help of interpreting his data. You don't believe in what he is doing? no problem. No need to say anything. It just never fails, someone will post asking about something and a few people out there will attack instead of help. Take time. Read and understand the post. If you have something positive to add, great. If you don't, no problem. You don't need to hear your self talk every time there is a post. I am done with this post. Good and Safe Shooting Everyone!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
HELP WITH SATERLEE VELOCITY TEST
Top