Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Help me interpret this Berger VLD COL test?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Onewolf" data-source="post: 768753" data-attributes="member: 54808"><p>I performed another Berger VLD 140 COL test this morning. Unfortunately there were several other shooters at the rifle range and they were bouncing the benches pretty good so I had several called 'flyers'. Because of these bouncing bench flyers I would call this COL test null and void, but I do have a newbie question about target analysis.</p><p> </p><p>These were all 5 shot groups. I have a question about the 2.860" COL target. There are only 3 holes. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> Two of the holes appear to be slightly larger than the other holes, but not to the extent that I could clearly 100% say they are 2 bullet holes. So either I shot two really really bad UNCALLED flyers or they are indeed 2 bullets in basically the same hole.</p><p> </p><p>Is there a good method for accurately determining whether they are '2 bullet' holes? </p><p> </p><p>I'm basically out of Berger VLD 140s at this point and I can't find them anywhere in-stock currently so it's probably ok that this test was FUBARed by the bouncing bench. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p> </p><p>I have decided to standardize on the Sierra MatchKing 142s for now because they are the only 'candidate' 6.5mm high BC bullets I could find in stock.</p><p> </p><p>Thanks.</p><p> </p><p>Doug</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.onewolf.org/Files/IMG_5933.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Onewolf, post: 768753, member: 54808"] I performed another Berger VLD 140 COL test this morning. Unfortunately there were several other shooters at the rifle range and they were bouncing the benches pretty good so I had several called 'flyers'. Because of these bouncing bench flyers I would call this COL test null and void, but I do have a newbie question about target analysis. These were all 5 shot groups. I have a question about the 2.860" COL target. There are only 3 holes. :confused: Two of the holes appear to be slightly larger than the other holes, but not to the extent that I could clearly 100% say they are 2 bullet holes. So either I shot two really really bad UNCALLED flyers or they are indeed 2 bullets in basically the same hole. Is there a good method for accurately determining whether they are '2 bullet' holes? I'm basically out of Berger VLD 140s at this point and I can't find them anywhere in-stock currently so it's probably ok that this test was FUBARed by the bouncing bench. :D I have decided to standardize on the Sierra MatchKing 142s for now because they are the only 'candidate' 6.5mm high BC bullets I could find in stock. Thanks. Doug [IMG]http://www.onewolf.org/Files/IMG_5933.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Help me interpret this Berger VLD COL test?
Top