Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4831 vs H4831sc accuracy and velocity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Varmint Hunter" data-source="post: 69366" data-attributes="member: 313"><p>I think there is (can be) an advantage to the bulkier H4831 over the SC. Generally speaking, it is preferable to fill the case to the base of the bullet.</p><p></p><p>In my 6.5x284, a full charge of H4831SC leaves enough room in the case for the powder to move back and forth a bit. If I had known to expect this I would have tried the regular H4831 instead, for improved loading density.</p><p></p><p>I always trickle up the last few grains when I'm loading so the longer grains wouldn't be a problem.</p><p></p><p>Just a thought - VH</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Varmint Hunter, post: 69366, member: 313"] I think there is (can be) an advantage to the bulkier H4831 over the SC. Generally speaking, it is preferable to fill the case to the base of the bullet. In my 6.5x284, a full charge of H4831SC leaves enough room in the case for the powder to move back and forth a bit. If I had known to expect this I would have tried the regular H4831 instead, for improved loading density. I always trickle up the last few grains when I'm loading so the longer grains wouldn't be a problem. Just a thought - VH [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4831 vs H4831sc accuracy and velocity
Top