Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 Vs. IMR4350
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KRP" data-source="post: 244332" data-attributes="member: 9969"><p>4831 is definately slower than 4350. What I meant was the IMR to H comparison was the same, IMR has larger kernels and is slightly faster with both powders. Reading johnnyk's response made me realize I may have added to the confusion with the wording of my earlier post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KRP, post: 244332, member: 9969"] 4831 is definately slower than 4350. What I meant was the IMR to H comparison was the same, IMR has larger kernels and is slightly faster with both powders. Reading johnnyk's response made me realize I may have added to the confusion with the wording of my earlier post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 Vs. IMR4350
Top