Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wilderness Blacktail" data-source="post: 1844683" data-attributes="member: 27906"><p>I have books by both Jack and Elmer and there are plenty of good things in both authors books. </p><p>Elmer had a bent for long range and long barreled rifles shooting long heavy sleek (for the time) bullets. </p><p> A quote I always remember from him, "anytime you have 3200' or even 3000 fps you are better off with more bullet weight ..." and goes on to talk about ballistics, energy, sectional density, etc. The same conversation happens here daily.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wilderness Blacktail, post: 1844683, member: 27906"] I have books by both Jack and Elmer and there are plenty of good things in both authors books. Elmer had a bent for long range and long barreled rifles shooting long heavy sleek (for the time) bullets. A quote I always remember from him, "anytime you have 3200' or even 3000 fps you are better off with more bullet weight ..." and goes on to talk about ballistics, energy, sectional density, etc. The same conversation happens here daily. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
Top