Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wilderness Blacktail" data-source="post: 1844496" data-attributes="member: 27906"><p>I truly get annoyed when people do apples to oranges comparisons to show how cartridge they're writing about is ballistically superior to X. </p><p> I'm talkin comparing a ho hum factory load with a 150gr Corelokt in a 30 cal, any of em! To a warm handload in a 6.5 or 7mm etc with a heavy, super high BC bullet out of a longer barrel. </p><p>And then saying, "look its ballistically superior in every way! </p><p> Spomer is particularly fond of doing this but others do too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wilderness Blacktail, post: 1844496, member: 27906"] I truly get annoyed when people do apples to oranges comparisons to show how cartridge they're writing about is ballistically superior to X. I'm talkin comparing a ho hum factory load with a 150gr Corelokt in a 30 cal, any of em! To a warm handload in a 6.5 or 7mm etc with a heavy, super high BC bullet out of a longer barrel. And then saying, "look its ballistically superior in every way! Spomer is particularly fond of doing this but others do too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
Top