Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DJ Fergus" data-source="post: 1843564" data-attributes="member: 93895"><p>I liked Jack OcConner. He promoted the 270 Winchester and it was well deserved. It's certainly a fine cartridge. I just don't see how the 264 win mag & 280 Remington was over looked for so many years, not that it matters cause it's water under the bridge. There's some fine cartridges today that are better than what the big manufactures have developed that may never go mainstream but should. Sherman cartridges come to mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DJ Fergus, post: 1843564, member: 93895"] I liked Jack OcConner. He promoted the 270 Winchester and it was well deserved. It's certainly a fine cartridge. I just don't see how the 264 win mag & 280 Remington was over looked for so many years, not that it matters cause it's water under the bridge. There's some fine cartridges today that are better than what the big manufactures have developed that may never go mainstream but should. Sherman cartridges come to mind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Gun writer statements that are no longer applicable or you don't agree with.
Top