Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Gun Laws
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 46119" data-source="post: 994138"><p>Apathy and ignorance of the masses.</p><p></p><p>Read carefully, I have great respect of LE in the field. Every time I needed LE, they did what should have been done.</p><p></p><p>The rights infringing laws and regulations are presented as public safety or first responder safety. That keeps the NRA off balance. Like the CA approved list. It definitely infringes but with law enforcement officer safety in the act, no support for a constitutional challenge.</p><p></p><p>The masses are convinced by the campaign that it won't affect them. So it's passed. Then, when joe public is confronted with an armed attacker the wait is 45 minutes. Hmmm, by the time LE arrives the attacker is gone, all safe for LE officer. Reduced LE injured on the job, lower cost to the state. This is a construct of the state, not LE. </p><p></p><p>Truth though, the only firearms pointed at me in anger/duty were LE. Of course one was the infamous Rampart District. The other, the similar San Diego county sheriff's. Both Have been 'reformed' since. Umm, right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 46119, post: 994138"] Apathy and ignorance of the masses. Read carefully, I have great respect of LE in the field. Every time I needed LE, they did what should have been done. The rights infringing laws and regulations are presented as public safety or first responder safety. That keeps the NRA off balance. Like the CA approved list. It definitely infringes but with law enforcement officer safety in the act, no support for a constitutional challenge. The masses are convinced by the campaign that it won't affect them. So it's passed. Then, when joe public is confronted with an armed attacker the wait is 45 minutes. Hmmm, by the time LE arrives the attacker is gone, all safe for LE officer. Reduced LE injured on the job, lower cost to the state. This is a construct of the state, not LE. Truth though, the only firearms pointed at me in anger/duty were LE. Of course one was the infamous Rampart District. The other, the similar San Diego county sheriff's. Both Have been 'reformed' since. Umm, right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Gun Laws
Top