Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Got my new long range shooter!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="akhunter" data-source="post: 475121" data-attributes="member: 9018"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">Mslrhunter, so far I really like the stock. I debated on the stock almost as long as the caliber. Cost and weight were the two things I kept going back to. I wanted more of a vertical grip/tactical style stock but didn't like all the weight, options and price that came with them. Jim told me that Grey Bull was coming out with a short action version of their stock and that I should look into it. After getting my hands on a long action version I called Grey bull and asked them to send a short action to Jim as soon as the first ones started rolling in. I really like the look and feel of the stock, and I think the weight is about perfect. My goal was to build a heavier hunting rifle for longer range shooting. Jim really liked the stock and told me he did or planned to order a few.</span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">True blue, I couldn't find any load data for the 6.5/300 saum or 6.5 saum whatever you want to call it. I do know that someone else has chambered it as I bought a set of Redding custom dies from one of the mail order catalogs. Redding tells me their minimum custom run is 25 sets and I bought the last or only set the supplier had. Anyway I used the data Hodgdon printed in their new magazine for reference. The closest I could find to my caliber was 7mm saum shooting the same weight bullet. They had on the low end a 140 Nosler BT going 2980 with 57 grains of Hybrid 100V and top end was 3217fps with 62 grains and 62 shows a compressed load. At this point I'm shooting coated bullets and past experience has told me that all else being equal it takes about (varies) an extra grain of powder to get the same velocity with a Danzac coated bullet as a non coated one. So I loaded up 5 with 58 grains and 5 with 59 grains. Looking back I should have started a grain or two lower. I seated the bullets about 100 thousandths off the lands to start with to help with lower pressures. It was cold as heck so I didn't write down the individual velocities but the 58 grain group averaged 3294fps with a smooth opening bolt. Later I noticed a hint of a rim around the primer dent, a sign of pressure. The 59 grain group averaged 3390 with the posted photo being the high. This is where I got a slightly sticky bolt. Now I know that 57 grains is probably my high and will need to drop as I move the bullet closer to the lands. My plan is to try to work the bullet closer to the lands and find a sweet spot that will still allow a round to fit in the magazine while maintaining accuracy and consistency, hopefully in the 3200+fps range. Sorry if the photo was misleading. I guess the lesson here is start lower/more conservative when you don't have proper load data.</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="akhunter, post: 475121, member: 9018"] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=black][FONT=Calibri]Mslrhunter, so far I really like the stock. I debated on the stock almost as long as the caliber. Cost and weight were the two things I kept going back to. I wanted more of a vertical grip/tactical style stock but didn’t like all the weight, options and price that came with them. Jim told me that Grey Bull was coming out with a short action version of their stock and that I should look into it. After getting my hands on a long action version I called Grey bull and asked them to send a short action to Jim as soon as the first ones started rolling in. I really like the look and feel of the stock, and I think the weight is about perfect. My goal was to build a heavier hunting rifle for longer range shooting. Jim really liked the stock and told me he did or planned to order a few.[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=black][FONT=Calibri]True blue, I couldn’t find any load data for the 6.5/300 saum or 6.5 saum whatever you want to call it. I do know that someone else has chambered it as I bought a set of Redding custom dies from one of the mail order catalogs. Redding tells me their minimum custom run is 25 sets and I bought the last or only set the supplier had. Anyway I used the data Hodgdon printed in their new magazine for reference. The closest I could find to my caliber was 7mm saum shooting the same weight bullet. They had on the low end a 140 Nosler BT going 2980 with 57 grains of Hybrid 100V and top end was 3217fps with 62 grains and 62 shows a compressed load. At this point I’m shooting coated bullets and past experience has told me that all else being equal it takes about (varies) an extra grain of powder to get the same velocity with a Danzac coated bullet as a non coated one. So I loaded up 5 with 58 grains and 5 with 59 grains. Looking back I should have started a grain or two lower. I seated the bullets about 100 thousandths off the lands to start with to help with lower pressures. It was cold as heck so I didn’t write down the individual velocities but the 58 grain group averaged 3294fps with a smooth opening bolt. Later I noticed a hint of a rim around the primer dent, a sign of pressure. The 59 grain group averaged 3390 with the posted photo being the high. This is where I got a slightly sticky bolt. Now I know that 57 grains is probably my high and will need to drop as I move the bullet closer to the lands. My plan is to try to work the bullet closer to the lands and find a sweet spot that will still allow a round to fit in the magazine while maintaining accuracy and consistency, hopefully in the 3200+fps range. Sorry if the photo was misleading. I guess the lesson here is start lower/more conservative when you don’t have proper load data.[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Got my new long range shooter!!
Top