Ok so the G7 is twice the money as the B. It has a better ballistic calculator (however it doesnt use specific bullets in its calculations) The beam divergance goes to the leica from what I have read. The G7 will out range the leica in overall range and its ballistics computer is setup to range out to 1400 yards. The leica will only reach to 880 yards with its ballistic solution from what I have read. The BIG question is: Is the G7 worth the $800 more? From everything I have read for a guy that is only shooting to 1400 yards the G7 is a pretty nice solution to a guys needs. The leica 1600-b has many of the same features as the G7 but it seems to me to fall short of the G7. I would like to hear from others what they think about compairing the G7 to the leica. Then to me I feel like if a guy was going to go with the g7 than he might as well spend a couple hundred more and get a terrapin. Like the leica compared to the g7 I feel that the vectronix terrapin is the best solution for under 2000. So all in all I guess my question is this. Would anyone buy the leica 1600b over the g7? If so why?