Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Focal plain which is best ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 599499" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>JonA, you do not have to agree with what I stated, but for sure it is no more garbage than your repeatedly stating everyone uses a LRF. There are plenty of shooters that use reticles to range game andor sizing of game. I, they and you know this process is only accurate within its limits of measuring error. For that a I chose 700 yards. That is my opinion.</p><p> </p><p>You bring a good point to the table about holding for wind. I repeat too, good point. But for us who dial in for wind, which I do because I feel it too is a better choice for longer distances, wind hold with the reticle means nothing to me. Thus another reason i feel the spf is a better choice for me.</p><p> </p><p>The smaller cal statement I made should be explained more. My bad. I was trying to say that in my opinion the FFP is usually used at lesser distances and I would hope you agree that for the very long distance shots larger cals are a better choice for obvious reasons.</p><p> </p><p>As for your quote on vital size targets. Do you feel you can accuratly confirm your drops on a target aimimg point of 1 moa or larger? I surely hope you would use a very precise hold to shoot groups at all distances, especially past 1200 or 1500 yards where I feel the FFP really fall short.</p><p> </p><p>I hardly think I make it a habit to post garbage, I try vary hard to post my actual field experiences and what I see is best. If you disagree that is fine. But I do take offence to the way you addressed my post and feel in no way does my trying to share field knowledge of my own deserve your rude responces.</p><p> </p><p>Some people do range with reticles, not all, and certainly not most. But you sir are the one spreading inaccuracies on that part.</p><p> </p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 599499, member: 7503"] JonA, you do not have to agree with what I stated, but for sure it is no more garbage than your repeatedly stating everyone uses a LRF. There are plenty of shooters that use reticles to range game andor sizing of game. I, they and you know this process is only accurate within its limits of measuring error. For that a I chose 700 yards. That is my opinion. You bring a good point to the table about holding for wind. I repeat too, good point. But for us who dial in for wind, which I do because I feel it too is a better choice for longer distances, wind hold with the reticle means nothing to me. Thus another reason i feel the spf is a better choice for me. The smaller cal statement I made should be explained more. My bad. I was trying to say that in my opinion the FFP is usually used at lesser distances and I would hope you agree that for the very long distance shots larger cals are a better choice for obvious reasons. As for your quote on vital size targets. Do you feel you can accuratly confirm your drops on a target aimimg point of 1 moa or larger? I surely hope you would use a very precise hold to shoot groups at all distances, especially past 1200 or 1500 yards where I feel the FFP really fall short. I hardly think I make it a habit to post garbage, I try vary hard to post my actual field experiences and what I see is best. If you disagree that is fine. But I do take offence to the way you addressed my post and feel in no way does my trying to share field knowledge of my own deserve your rude responces. Some people do range with reticles, not all, and certainly not most. But you sir are the one spreading inaccuracies on that part. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Focal plain which is best ?
Top