Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fmajor" data-source="post: 773681" data-attributes="member: 20646"><p>In the (albeit entirely out of the *self*) interest of seeing this discussion continue, I hope both parties will stick strictly to the facts while avoiding excessive criticism and/or refrain from taking potshots - even in the midst of frustration/angst and general <strong>****ed-offed-ness</strong>. gun) <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>Thank you.</p><p></p><p>Also, thank you "Ishootkittens" for posting your question - it is timely and likely to be in the back of many readers minds - especially as these technologies become more affordable. I know i've been curious about this as well.</p><p></p><p>To both Broz and Orkan: I respect both of your experience, knowledge and expertise on this topic. This has been and i hope will continue to be, a very informative *discussion*. </p><p></p><p>I appreciate the situation when we have our own well-thought-out opinions on a matter, substantiated with fact and positive, practical experiences which support our position. I have been and continue to be in similar situations, though not specifically this topic. </p><p></p><p>We can all line up our own team of experts, successes, performance benchmarks, etc etc ad nauseum to support our position. However, it is entirely possible at the end of the discussion to remain on opposite ends of the idea continuum. Is this all bad? To have choices is a good thing. </p><p></p><p>We have greater fights ahead of us than ffp vs sfp - our entire access to guns is being assaulted - lets keep our energies for fight focused elsewhere. </p><p></p><p>In the hope of seeing this dialogue continue, it's important to realize it's possible for folks to have preferences based on their very personal response to/success with either ffp or sfp reticles/optics. There seem to be excellent potential applications to either method and possible short-comings as well. </p><p></p><p>Those of us without the depth of knowledge, experience, expertise or opportunity to gain these depend on those of you who do. We look to you all to learn from since most of us don't have the resources to examine, personally, all the options here.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for your time in contributing thus far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fmajor, post: 773681, member: 20646"] In the (albeit entirely out of the *self*) interest of seeing this discussion continue, I hope both parties will stick strictly to the facts while avoiding excessive criticism and/or refrain from taking potshots - even in the midst of frustration/angst and general [B]****ed-offed-ness[/B]. gun) :D Thank you. Also, thank you "Ishootkittens" for posting your question - it is timely and likely to be in the back of many readers minds - especially as these technologies become more affordable. I know i've been curious about this as well. To both Broz and Orkan: I respect both of your experience, knowledge and expertise on this topic. This has been and i hope will continue to be, a very informative *discussion*. I appreciate the situation when we have our own well-thought-out opinions on a matter, substantiated with fact and positive, practical experiences which support our position. I have been and continue to be in similar situations, though not specifically this topic. We can all line up our own team of experts, successes, performance benchmarks, etc etc ad nauseum to support our position. However, it is entirely possible at the end of the discussion to remain on opposite ends of the idea continuum. Is this all bad? To have choices is a good thing. We have greater fights ahead of us than ffp vs sfp - our entire access to guns is being assaulted - lets keep our energies for fight focused elsewhere. In the hope of seeing this dialogue continue, it's important to realize it's possible for folks to have preferences based on their very personal response to/success with either ffp or sfp reticles/optics. There seem to be excellent potential applications to either method and possible short-comings as well. Those of us without the depth of knowledge, experience, expertise or opportunity to gain these depend on those of you who do. We look to you all to learn from since most of us don't have the resources to examine, personally, all the options here. Thanks for your time in contributing thus far. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
Top