Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="orkan" data-source="post: 773138" data-attributes="member: 25377"><p>Not at all... I was referencing my last post specifically where I mentioned movers, not the spirit of the long distance overtone of the thread. </p><p></p><p>Your position is that SFP is more capable than FFP. </p><p>My position is that of the opposite. </p><p></p><p>You have very little experience with FFP, and a great deal of experience with SFP. </p><p>I have a great deal of experience with both. </p><p></p><p>I can tell you that nearly anything a SFP optic can do, there is a FFP optic which can do it better. This driven by my direct, first-hand experience with both. You disagree. </p><p></p><p>Is it unreasonable to ask that you gain experience in the area you are lacking before solidifying that opinion and inciting others to follow? What if you find that your opinion is false, after you gain more experience? Wouldn't it be a disservice to those whom listened to your opinion earlier which was born out of inexperience? </p><p></p><p>I try to be extremely careful to gain a great deal of experience in a specific topic before handing out advice on it. My reputation can suffer greatly otherwise, and that will cost me dearly. </p><p></p><p>For instance, I've never hunted an elk in my life. I have opinions about it... but as I lack experience, I would gladly defer to your advice if we were talking about killing an elk. First hand experience is significantly important.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="orkan, post: 773138, member: 25377"] Not at all... I was referencing my last post specifically where I mentioned movers, not the spirit of the long distance overtone of the thread. Your position is that SFP is more capable than FFP. My position is that of the opposite. You have very little experience with FFP, and a great deal of experience with SFP. I have a great deal of experience with both. I can tell you that nearly anything a SFP optic can do, there is a FFP optic which can do it better. This driven by my direct, first-hand experience with both. You disagree. Is it unreasonable to ask that you gain experience in the area you are lacking before solidifying that opinion and inciting others to follow? What if you find that your opinion is false, after you gain more experience? Wouldn't it be a disservice to those whom listened to your opinion earlier which was born out of inexperience? I try to be extremely careful to gain a great deal of experience in a specific topic before handing out advice on it. My reputation can suffer greatly otherwise, and that will cost me dearly. For instance, I've never hunted an elk in my life. I have opinions about it... but as I lack experience, I would gladly defer to your advice if we were talking about killing an elk. First hand experience is significantly important. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
First Focal Plane Vs. Second Focal Plane
Top