1. shooter65

    shooter65 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    903
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Obama Finds Legal Way Around The 2nd. Amendment and Uses It..
    The Full Article Here
    http://www.reuters. com/article/ politicsNews/ idUSTRE59E0Q9200 91015
    Subject: Obama Takes First Step in Banning All Firearms

    On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.
    The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
    This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
    Read the Article
    U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
    The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
    The Full Article
    http://www.reuters. com/article/ politicsNews/ idUSTRE59E0Q9200 91015

    Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.
    Silence will lead us to Socialism.
     
  2. britz

    britz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,217
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    no offense but this reminds me of the one where the govmt was going to pass a law taxing all fire arms and registering them but citizens wouldn't have to be informed until 30 days after the law was already passed.
     

  3. cavtrooper94

    cavtrooper94 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    284
    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Anybody got more on this???????????????
     
  4. britz

    britz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,217
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
  5. roaddog1m

    roaddog1m Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    306
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    I can't find the article in Reuters!
     
  6. NomadPilot

    NomadPilot Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    510
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
  7. roaddog1m

    roaddog1m Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    306
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Thanks Nomadpilot!
     
  8. cavtrooper94

    cavtrooper94 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    284
    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Well this sounds pretty shitty
     
  9. shooter65

    shooter65 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    903
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
  10. britz

    britz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,217
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    mountains out of mole hills imho.
     
  11. cavtrooper94

    cavtrooper94 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    284
    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    I still don't see how they can go around the Constitution. That would still infringe the 2nd Amendment. I'm gettin tired of this. Just when you think they're going to go focus on something that needs fixin, I read this. Guess I'll go load up a couple more mags.gun)
     
  12. Great Googly Moogly

    Great Googly Moogly Member

    Messages:
    14
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Treaties are invalid if not Constitutional. Ask the American Indians how treaties worked out for them.
     
  13. fj40mojo

    fj40mojo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    392
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Μολὼν λάβε

    Nuff said.