Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 201368" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>I believe the best you'll get with a FFP, is just what we have always had in SFP.</p><p>All the proclaimed 'benefits' are nothing new.</p><p></p><p>If you care to range with a reticle instead of a LRF, you can do it at a set power in SFP. Same with hold over if you don't care to dial in elevation..</p><p>Sombodys reticle may suit you better, but ultimately there is none better than a standard med-fine crosshair.</p><p>So where is there any real improvement in FFP over SFP?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 201368, member: 1521"] I believe the best you'll get with a FFP, is just what we have always had in SFP. All the proclaimed 'benefits' are nothing new. If you care to range with a reticle instead of a LRF, you can do it at a set power in SFP. Same with hold over if you don't care to dial in elevation.. Sombodys reticle may suit you better, but ultimately there is none better than a standard med-fine crosshair. So where is there any real improvement in FFP over SFP? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
FFP vs SFP
Top