Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expander ball fact or fiction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 1211507" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>IMO, brass brand has no bearing on this subject.</p><p>Lapua is quality brass, but it still has considerable variance. If I wanted brass with less variance out of the box I'd buy Norma. But I use Lapua for it's hardness combined with workable baseline quality.</p><p>Where Norma or Lapua do not provide for my cartridge, I just cull the best of whatever does(just as I do with Lapua anyway). With this, I do expect that I'll rake more brass into a trash can(ex. Winchester) than I would with Lapua. Never lose any in Norma.</p><p>But when I can buy a big bag of Win Reloading brass for next to nothing, and cull 50 perfect cases, I did alright money-wise,, and the trade-off was effort(never results).</p><p></p><p>I'm someone who uses custom body dies for shoulder bump only. Separate inline bushing dies for partial neck sizing, then a mandrel die for neck expansion (pre-expansion, or pre-seating).</p><p>My necks are turned, but I can make loaded ammo runout very low with unturned necks.</p><p>Mandrel expansion is not just for low runout. Expansion itself is beneficial to normalizing seating forces(for accurate seating depths) and loaded tension(inward springback, bullet grip). Partial neck sizing is beneficial for just as much again. And NOT sizing the body mitigates growing bananas out of brass.</p><p></p><p>But as I implied earlier, not everyone can do this. I believe those who understand reloading actions also know there is no one thing that could be said to apply across the board.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 1211507, member: 1521"] IMO, brass brand has no bearing on this subject. Lapua is quality brass, but it still has considerable variance. If I wanted brass with less variance out of the box I'd buy Norma. But I use Lapua for it's hardness combined with workable baseline quality. Where Norma or Lapua do not provide for my cartridge, I just cull the best of whatever does(just as I do with Lapua anyway). With this, I do expect that I'll rake more brass into a trash can(ex. Winchester) than I would with Lapua. Never lose any in Norma. But when I can buy a big bag of Win Reloading brass for next to nothing, and cull 50 perfect cases, I did alright money-wise,, and the trade-off was effort(never results). I'm someone who uses custom body dies for shoulder bump only. Separate inline bushing dies for partial neck sizing, then a mandrel die for neck expansion (pre-expansion, or pre-seating). My necks are turned, but I can make loaded ammo runout very low with unturned necks. Mandrel expansion is not just for low runout. Expansion itself is beneficial to normalizing seating forces(for accurate seating depths) and loaded tension(inward springback, bullet grip). Partial neck sizing is beneficial for just as much again. And NOT sizing the body mitigates growing bananas out of brass. But as I implied earlier, not everyone can do this. I believe those who understand reloading actions also know there is no one thing that could be said to apply across the board. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Expander ball fact or fiction
Top