Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Europe's Energy crisis.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Muddyboots" data-source="post: 2579777" data-attributes="member: 63925"><p>I worked in the environmental field for 40+ years and I can tell you the Green Party only uses part of the total green narrative that fits their agenda. In a standard environmental management system, you are required to identify all of your environmental aspects and impacts, and determine which are significant. Some environmental aspects may be regulated, while others may not be. For example, if you identify the generation of a particular air emission as a significant environmental aspect, it would help to know which operation(s) generate such air emissions. It might also help to know whether these air emissions have an impact upon the environment. A true analysis does a full assessment of all goods and services and how those are actually impacting the environment. For example, the production of batteries for EV and what is their impact from mining right up to manufacturing of the battery. There is no way in hello this is part of any Green Party narrative. Just remember they believe "End justifies the means"! Hammer Sickle party uses same approach. I would love to see full cradle to cradle assessment of EV production right back to taking raw materials from the ground. If the total impact is greater than the value, then the process has to be reassessed to find process improvements such the actual final assessment proves less of an impact. Just remember every manufacturing plant that makes parts for an EV that contributes to a carbon footprint is part of the total. </p><p></p><p>Old standard premise for change: speak with data.</p><p></p><p>Good luck seeing this coming to fruition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Muddyboots, post: 2579777, member: 63925"] I worked in the environmental field for 40+ years and I can tell you the Green Party only uses part of the total green narrative that fits their agenda. In a standard environmental management system, you are required to identify all of your environmental aspects and impacts, and determine which are significant. Some environmental aspects may be regulated, while others may not be. For example, if you identify the generation of a particular air emission as a significant environmental aspect, it would help to know which operation(s) generate such air emissions. It might also help to know whether these air emissions have an impact upon the environment. A true analysis does a full assessment of all goods and services and how those are actually impacting the environment. For example, the production of batteries for EV and what is their impact from mining right up to manufacturing of the battery. There is no way in hello this is part of any Green Party narrative. Just remember they believe "End justifies the means"! Hammer Sickle party uses same approach. I would love to see full cradle to cradle assessment of EV production right back to taking raw materials from the ground. If the total impact is greater than the value, then the process has to be reassessed to find process improvements such the actual final assessment proves less of an impact. Just remember every manufacturing plant that makes parts for an EV that contributes to a carbon footprint is part of the total. Old standard premise for change: speak with data. Good luck seeing this coming to fruition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Europe's Energy crisis.
Top