Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Elevation Dope
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="liltank" data-source="post: 350255" data-attributes="member: 13275"><p>No, at 700yrds. The deflection when I shot at 400yrds was a perfect 90degrees with no prevailing head wind or tail wind. The program matches up if I should have known about the deflection of the stiff head wind forcing the bullet down. I would guess at 400 hundred I wouldn't see that much drop because it has much less Howitzer effect. </p><p></p><p>400=8.25 MOA up, 700= 20.25, but the 10-15mph head wind requires a 2 MOA lift to account for loss of velocity and wind pressure forcing on the nose of the bullet. This results in a number closer to 22.25 MOA. </p><p></p><p>Make sense?</p><p></p><p>Tank</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="liltank, post: 350255, member: 13275"] No, at 700yrds. The deflection when I shot at 400yrds was a perfect 90degrees with no prevailing head wind or tail wind. The program matches up if I should have known about the deflection of the stiff head wind forcing the bullet down. I would guess at 400 hundred I wouldn't see that much drop because it has much less Howitzer effect. 400=8.25 MOA up, 700= 20.25, but the 10-15mph head wind requires a 2 MOA lift to account for loss of velocity and wind pressure forcing on the nose of the bullet. This results in a number closer to 22.25 MOA. Make sense? Tank [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Elevation Dope
Top