Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Election 2016!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BAR BAR 2" data-source="post: 1189054" data-attributes="member: 90629"><p>I will vote for whomever supports states rights and is in favor of transferring ownership of federal lands to the states. saying the states cannot afford to maintain those lands doesn't really make sense when we look at all of the money the feds are making off those lands. I am not a in favor of bigger and more intrusive government. We need a smaller and less potent federal government. </p><p></p><p>If it came down to Kasich and Hillary and my vote was going to be the one determining the winner, I would vote third party. Back in '94, Kasich, got a nice little 'Thank You' note from President Clinton thanking him for his support, along with thirty something other Republicans, in passing the assault weapons ban. In my opinion, Kasich, is the type of politician that has made the people mad enough to throw their support behind someone like Trump.</p><p></p><p>I am alot more worried about the different scenarios that could lead to a switch in the House and Senate majorities. The choices we have for the Whitehouse are dismal at best and I am scared of what is coming, regardless of who gets in there, but we have to stop the cycle of voting for the least evil and vote for the most constitutional instead. Voting for the lesser of two evils is what the R's have learned to count on, which is the reason we seem to never have a choice we like.</p><p></p><p>Just my two cents.</p><p></p><p>Tex</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BAR BAR 2, post: 1189054, member: 90629"] I will vote for whomever supports states rights and is in favor of transferring ownership of federal lands to the states. saying the states cannot afford to maintain those lands doesn't really make sense when we look at all of the money the feds are making off those lands. I am not a in favor of bigger and more intrusive government. We need a smaller and less potent federal government. If it came down to Kasich and Hillary and my vote was going to be the one determining the winner, I would vote third party. Back in '94, Kasich, got a nice little 'Thank You' note from President Clinton thanking him for his support, along with thirty something other Republicans, in passing the assault weapons ban. In my opinion, Kasich, is the type of politician that has made the people mad enough to throw their support behind someone like Trump. I am alot more worried about the different scenarios that could lead to a switch in the House and Senate majorities. The choices we have for the Whitehouse are dismal at best and I am scared of what is coming, regardless of who gets in there, but we have to stop the cycle of voting for the least evil and vote for the most constitutional instead. Voting for the lesser of two evils is what the R's have learned to count on, which is the reason we seem to never have a choice we like. Just my two cents. Tex [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Election 2016!
Top