Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Dynamic Research bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SavageShtr" data-source="post: 627601" data-attributes="member: 15118"><p>I just don't see how anything in the .338 caliber class that is less than 300gr's would be able to outperform them! I mean run the #'s the lighter bullets may be able to get to the target faster and flatter but is in no way close in energy. If you are a target shooter only than I can see a place for them, but I will take my 300gr OTM's first any day of the week. I don't care if I have to dial another minute or two for the 300's. It just doesn't make any sence that some one can say a 236gr bullet with a pore .500 BC can be ballistically better. Sounds like a nice marketing ploy to me. I don't know maybe I missed something some where. The only place that I could see that particular bullet making an impact is for say the 338 win mag type calibers! I don't think it makes much sence to shoot that light of a bullet out of the large 338's with more case capacity. that's just my $.02 but I'm sure there are other's that will say differently.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SavageShtr, post: 627601, member: 15118"] I just don't see how anything in the .338 caliber class that is less than 300gr's would be able to outperform them! I mean run the #'s the lighter bullets may be able to get to the target faster and flatter but is in no way close in energy. If you are a target shooter only than I can see a place for them, but I will take my 300gr OTM's first any day of the week. I don't care if I have to dial another minute or two for the 300's. It just doesn't make any sence that some one can say a 236gr bullet with a pore .500 BC can be ballistically better. Sounds like a nice marketing ploy to me. I don't know maybe I missed something some where. The only place that I could see that particular bullet making an impact is for say the 338 win mag type calibers! I don't think it makes much sence to shoot that light of a bullet out of the large 338's with more case capacity. that's just my $.02 but I'm sure there are other's that will say differently. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Dynamic Research bullets
Top