Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Did I just make a mistake?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coopershawk" data-source="post: 1302581" data-attributes="member: 90458"><p>Perhaps I did misunderstand your reason for posting the thread. Certainly anyone can buy whatever they wish. I own several brands myself. The problem is you based your research on a very unscientific sample and made a decison about an entire brand based on a handful of threads. </p><p> Then, with no personal experience of your own to contribute, you opted to "publish" the results of your "findings". Why? All you accomplished was to intimate that your exhaustive search of supposedly qualified posters proves Leupold quality control is bad. What purpose does it serve to regurgitate other people's opinions?</p><p> So now you have added to this body of internet "evidence" that Leupold is bad. </p><p> To be fair to Leupold- they arguably have more scopes in the field than all the other makers combined- and they still warranty them. Of course there are more disappointed owners- there are a LOT more owners overall. If I did internet research on Ford and Tesla I'm fairly certain I'd find more complaints about Ford. Does that mean Fords are all junk?</p><p> I'm not gonna say Leupold hasn't cut a corner or two and made some mistakes. But I will say they stand behind their products. </p><p> I'm sure there are lots of wonderful optics choices out there- buy one and tell everyone on the internet how awesome it is before you even mount it on a rifle. Then we can reference your opinion to justify buying a 'Nitron Benderski X7". They must be the best scopes ever made since I never read a negative comment on a bulletin board.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coopershawk, post: 1302581, member: 90458"] Perhaps I did misunderstand your reason for posting the thread. Certainly anyone can buy whatever they wish. I own several brands myself. The problem is you based your research on a very unscientific sample and made a decison about an entire brand based on a handful of threads. Then, with no personal experience of your own to contribute, you opted to "publish" the results of your "findings". Why? All you accomplished was to intimate that your exhaustive search of supposedly qualified posters proves Leupold quality control is bad. What purpose does it serve to regurgitate other people's opinions? So now you have added to this body of internet "evidence" that Leupold is bad. To be fair to Leupold- they arguably have more scopes in the field than all the other makers combined- and they still warranty them. Of course there are more disappointed owners- there are a LOT more owners overall. If I did internet research on Ford and Tesla I'm fairly certain I'd find more complaints about Ford. Does that mean Fords are all junk? I'm not gonna say Leupold hasn't cut a corner or two and made some mistakes. But I will say they stand behind their products. I'm sure there are lots of wonderful optics choices out there- buy one and tell everyone on the internet how awesome it is before you even mount it on a rifle. Then we can reference your opinion to justify buying a 'Nitron Benderski X7". They must be the best scopes ever made since I never read a negative comment on a bulletin board. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Did I just make a mistake?
Top