Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Dialing elevation vs mil dot holdover
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SBruce" data-source="post: 479625" data-attributes="member: 21068"><p>I just stuck with the 1/3 on this post, because I had referenced in earlier post that 1/10 mil was basically equal to 1/3 moa.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Bought my first Nightforce pretty close to 15 years ago. Reason I bought it was because Leupold didn't offer MOA, and I really didn't want to use Mil any more (thought "there has gotta be something a little more precise and maybe quicker/easier for ranging"). What reticles they did have at the time has long since escaped my memory though.?</p><p> </p><p>I never looked into S&B or IOR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SBruce, post: 479625, member: 21068"] I just stuck with the 1/3 on this post, because I had referenced in earlier post that 1/10 mil was basically equal to 1/3 moa. Bought my first Nightforce pretty close to 15 years ago. Reason I bought it was because Leupold didn't offer MOA, and I really didn't want to use Mil any more (thought "there has gotta be something a little more precise and maybe quicker/easier for ranging"). What reticles they did have at the time has long since escaped my memory though.? I never looked into S&B or IOR. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Dialing elevation vs mil dot holdover
Top