Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Custom action help. Which one is best?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrmax" data-source="post: 1336404" data-attributes="member: 85491"><p>Mausingfield Are you serious they took all the worst features of the Mauser and Springfield and made a new action , duh ! Control feed is NOT a good system even if you have the extractor claw modified to pass over a round in the chamber, it breaks extractors just look at the Brno ZZK's , Mausers and Springfields with broken extractors. Control feed, well you better check the original Mausers and Springfields as they had the feed lips machined into the under side of the rails and all most all the new so called Control Feed rifles of today used the stamped magazine wells to act as feed lips, doesn't work the same. Springfield ejector system was its weakest feature it broke too often and was one of the spare parts in the spare parts on the butt of some of the issued rifles along with an extractor. Both Mauser and Springfield have to make modification of the actions for the added width of the claw extractor on the bolt. Sorry about the point that having won 5 US NRA National Championships , over 50 regional matches over a dozen National records in the US and the most number of notable scores in NZ , all were won with Remington 700's or 40-X's. I'll be shooting these forever with an endless supply of parts , buy a custom action and the stupid take your bolt out of your rifle rule in NZ and you may be permanently out of action ! Don't believe me look at the list of discontinued action in DeHass's book on actions .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrmax, post: 1336404, member: 85491"] Mausingfield Are you serious they took all the worst features of the Mauser and Springfield and made a new action , duh ! Control feed is NOT a good system even if you have the extractor claw modified to pass over a round in the chamber, it breaks extractors just look at the Brno ZZK's , Mausers and Springfields with broken extractors. Control feed, well you better check the original Mausers and Springfields as they had the feed lips machined into the under side of the rails and all most all the new so called Control Feed rifles of today used the stamped magazine wells to act as feed lips, doesn't work the same. Springfield ejector system was its weakest feature it broke too often and was one of the spare parts in the spare parts on the butt of some of the issued rifles along with an extractor. Both Mauser and Springfield have to make modification of the actions for the added width of the claw extractor on the bolt. Sorry about the point that having won 5 US NRA National Championships , over 50 regional matches over a dozen National records in the US and the most number of notable scores in NZ , all were won with Remington 700's or 40-X's. I'll be shooting these forever with an endless supply of parts , buy a custom action and the stupid take your bolt out of your rifle rule in NZ and you may be permanently out of action ! Don't believe me look at the list of discontinued action in DeHass's book on actions . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Custom action help. Which one is best?
Top