Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Crossbow Hunting
Crossbow specific mechanical broadhead testing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OkieBowie" data-source="post: 531390" data-attributes="member: 26507"><p><strong>Duly noted!</strong></p><p></p><p>The following isn't exactly the same as the two blade cut-on-contact head, but it <u>may</u> be close enough to reduce the 20% wasted energy to the point it is acceptable on a Mechanical.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.newarchery.com/products/1-16/broadheads/spitfire-xp-pro.html" target="_blank">New Archery Products Spitfire XP Pro Expandable Broadhead</a></p><p><a href="http://www.grimreaperbroadheads.com/RazorCut.html" target="_blank">Grim Reaper Broadheads</a></p><p></p><p>I just realized something. lightbulb Maybe I need to go with a whack-on-contact broadhead. <em>Since, all my TAC-15 shots have blown through the Deer and ended up wasting the remaining energy burrowing into hard dirt.</em> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p><em>PS:</em> I am an old, old Razorback Five fan, that switched to NAP's XP for my (cough) regular <em>vertical</em> bow sticks. But went with the Grim Reapers for my TAC-15 arrows.</p><p><a href="http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff90/broadhead_photos/8-32-threaded/Razorback_5.jpg" target="_blank">http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff90/broadhead_photos/8-32-threaded/Razorback_5.jpg</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OkieBowie, post: 531390, member: 26507"] [B]Duly noted![/B] The following isn't exactly the same as the two blade cut-on-contact head, but it [U]may[/U] be close enough to reduce the 20% wasted energy to the point it is acceptable on a Mechanical. [URL="http://www.newarchery.com/products/1-16/broadheads/spitfire-xp-pro.html"]New Archery Products Spitfire XP Pro Expandable Broadhead[/URL] [URL="http://www.grimreaperbroadheads.com/RazorCut.html"]Grim Reaper Broadheads[/URL] I just realized something. lightbulb Maybe I need to go with a whack-on-contact broadhead. [I]Since, all my TAC-15 shots have blown through the Deer and ended up wasting the remaining energy burrowing into hard dirt.[/I] :D [I]PS:[/I] I am an old, old Razorback Five fan, that switched to NAP's XP for my (cough) regular [I]vertical[/I] bow sticks. But went with the Grim Reapers for my TAC-15 arrows. [URL]http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff90/broadhead_photos/8-32-threaded/Razorback_5.jpg[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Crossbow Hunting
Crossbow specific mechanical broadhead testing
Top