Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Concentricity .. how important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lancetkenyon" data-source="post: 1439770" data-attributes="member: 68875"><p>Just a question JE, would you say that over 200, like 500-1000+, errors also show up from shooter induced inconsistencies and environmental effects far greater than at 100-200 as well?</p><p></p><p>Case in point:</p><p></p><p>.280 AI as seen above @ 100 (.169") .162MOA</p><p><a href="http://s642.photobucket.com/user/lancetkenyon13/media/280AI%20Build/20180325_120330_zps8ok0vkpl.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu142/lancetkenyon13/280AI%20Build/20180325_120330_zps8ok0vkpl.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p>Same rifle, same load @ 921 (2.9") .255MOA (if my math is correct?)</p><p><a href="http://s642.photobucket.com/user/lancetkenyon13/media/280AI%20Build/20180101_112229_zpsgdsgmemu.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu142/lancetkenyon13/280AI%20Build/20180101_112229_zpsgdsgmemu.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a></p><p></p><p>Pretty much as accurate as I could hold with a 3-15x Premier in a sub-9# rifle, and was as consistent as I could be that day. To say I was happy would be an understatement. But, chasing that extra .1 is always something I am looking for.</p><p></p><p>How much do you think run out played in this? I cannot tell you what run out was, as I just grabbed 3 rounds from my hunting loads, which I don't check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lancetkenyon, post: 1439770, member: 68875"] Just a question JE, would you say that over 200, like 500-1000+, errors also show up from shooter induced inconsistencies and environmental effects far greater than at 100-200 as well? Case in point: .280 AI as seen above @ 100 (.169") .162MOA [URL=http://s642.photobucket.com/user/lancetkenyon13/media/280AI%20Build/20180325_120330_zps8ok0vkpl.jpg.html][IMG]http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu142/lancetkenyon13/280AI%20Build/20180325_120330_zps8ok0vkpl.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Same rifle, same load @ 921 (2.9") .255MOA (if my math is correct?) [URL=http://s642.photobucket.com/user/lancetkenyon13/media/280AI%20Build/20180101_112229_zpsgdsgmemu.jpg.html][IMG]http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu142/lancetkenyon13/280AI%20Build/20180101_112229_zpsgdsgmemu.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Pretty much as accurate as I could hold with a 3-15x Premier in a sub-9# rifle, and was as consistent as I could be that day. To say I was happy would be an understatement. But, chasing that extra .1 is always something I am looking for. How much do you think run out played in this? I cannot tell you what run out was, as I just grabbed 3 rounds from my hunting loads, which I don't check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Concentricity .. how important?
Top