Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Cold bore testing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J E Custom" data-source="post: 1499319" data-attributes="member: 2736"><p>No apology necessary. It is a discussion and we can all learn from it.</p><p></p><p>I personally don't do test at distances that can alter the results due to shooter error. But his testing was interesting and showed greater error</p><p>than a close range test. </p><p></p><p>If I could, I would do all of my accuracy test using a machine rest to completely eliminate human error. (I have plenty of that to deal with)</p><p> But any test is productive if it shows a difference in what you are trying to find out and narrows it down.</p><p></p><p>J E CUSTOM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J E Custom, post: 1499319, member: 2736"] No apology necessary. It is a discussion and we can all learn from it. I personally don't do test at distances that can alter the results due to shooter error. But his testing was interesting and showed greater error than a close range test. If I could, I would do all of my accuracy test using a machine rest to completely eliminate human error. (I have plenty of that to deal with) But any test is productive if it shows a difference in what you are trying to find out and narrows it down. J E CUSTOM [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Cold bore testing
Top