Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Case weight vs internal volume
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="benchracer" data-source="post: 962716" data-attributes="member: 22069"><p>I think the core questions that have to be examined are:</p><p> </p><p>What is the objective?</p><p> </p><p>Which technique is appropriate to the stated objective?</p><p> </p><p>Simple weight sorting will get you to a certain point. Exactly where that point is, I don't know. It is still too early in the learning curve for me to have any answers of any kind. In fact, I am still refining my questions to help me to arrive at better answers. That is the reason for this entire discussion.</p><p> </p><p>For those that have dealt with this issue, I am interested to know what was done and what the results were.</p><p> </p><p>I believe that what Mike is getting at is that weight sorting only takes you so far. If the ultimate requirement is maximum precision and maximum consistency, there is no way around actually measuring case volume. I don't believe he is saying that weight sorting isn't appropriate for any purpose or circumstance.</p><p> </p><p>In the end, I hope to have some hard data that will tell us something about what is really needed to achieve a given objective. For starters, though, it's good to hear from those with relevant experience. At this stage, the discussion (and formation of a hypothesis) is the important part.</p><p> </p><p>The REALLY interesting part of the debate will come when we have actual data to argue over. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="benchracer, post: 962716, member: 22069"] I think the core questions that have to be examined are: What is the objective? Which technique is appropriate to the stated objective? Simple weight sorting will get you to a certain point. Exactly where that point is, I don't know. It is still too early in the learning curve for me to have any answers of any kind. In fact, I am still refining my questions to help me to arrive at better answers. That is the reason for this entire discussion. For those that have dealt with this issue, I am interested to know what was done and what the results were. I believe that what Mike is getting at is that weight sorting only takes you so far. If the ultimate requirement is maximum precision and maximum consistency, there is no way around actually measuring case volume. I don't believe he is saying that weight sorting isn't appropriate for any purpose or circumstance. In the end, I hope to have some hard data that will tell us something about what is really needed to achieve a given objective. For starters, though, it's good to hear from those with relevant experience. At this stage, the discussion (and formation of a hypothesis) is the important part. The REALLY interesting part of the debate will come when we have actual data to argue over. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Case weight vs internal volume
Top