Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Can't get my head around this
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 513336" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>Litz/Berger did do a 'mythbuster' on the elliptical swerving notions. It only happens within feet of muzzle release and ain't causing decreasing moa, or anything else -decreasing.</p><p></p><p>I am one of 'those shooters' who consistently shoot tighter grouping in moa with distance.</p><p>I can't prove anything, but I believe it's scope parallax. </p><p>This passes more tests..</p><p></p><p>I also consistently shoot with scopes at 25x or higher, and I wear prescription glasses.</p><p>Any gun I shoot tighter at distance with, holds growing moa(as expected) when my son shoots them.</p><p>He has eagle eyes, perfect method, and is a far better 100-200yrd shooter than I. But I catch up by 500yds!</p><p></p><p>I've thought about it alot. Notice while shooting through glasses that there is just this little tiny area on the edge of the shooting eye lens that has to be focused through. This area NEVER matches a center lens prescription. That may be significant. Also, setting parallax on a scope is much easier and precise with growing distance. Our brains adjust vision to focus even with a relatively bad parallax setting -up close. But at distance, anything other than dead on seems blurry and moves more with head movement. </p><p>There is no band to play with at distance, that a brain could quickly adjust to.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, it's my theory, but I cannot acquire a solution from local lens-flippers...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 513336, member: 1521"] Litz/Berger did do a 'mythbuster' on the elliptical swerving notions. It only happens within feet of muzzle release and ain't causing decreasing moa, or anything else -decreasing. I am one of 'those shooters' who consistently shoot tighter grouping in moa with distance. I can't prove anything, but I believe it's scope parallax. This passes more tests.. I also consistently shoot with scopes at 25x or higher, and I wear prescription glasses. Any gun I shoot tighter at distance with, holds growing moa(as expected) when my son shoots them. He has eagle eyes, perfect method, and is a far better 100-200yrd shooter than I. But I catch up by 500yds! I've thought about it alot. Notice while shooting through glasses that there is just this little tiny area on the edge of the shooting eye lens that has to be focused through. This area NEVER matches a center lens prescription. That may be significant. Also, setting parallax on a scope is much easier and precise with growing distance. Our brains adjust vision to focus even with a relatively bad parallax setting -up close. But at distance, anything other than dead on seems blurry and moves more with head movement. There is no band to play with at distance, that a brain could quickly adjust to. Anyway, it's my theory, but I cannot acquire a solution from local lens-flippers... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Can't get my head around this
Top