Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
burn rate charts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wedgy" data-source="post: 1150818" data-attributes="member: 64108"><p>The Graf & Son's chart has rl25 faster than H1000</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.grafs.com/catalog/tech-resource/technicalResourceId/14/productId/162" target="_blank">https://www.grafs.com/catalog/tech-resource/technicalResourceId/14/productId/162</a></p><p> </p><p>or better yet an explanation of why the burn rates aren't really accurate</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.chuckhawks.com/powder_burn_rate.htm" target="_blank">Why Burn Rate Is Meaningless</a></p><p> </p><p>"Burn rate/Relative quickness does not tell use the physical shape of a powder, its composition, or the types of coatings. It cannot tell us whether a powder is single-based, double based, or triple based. It does not tell us the heat of explosion, the progressive / degressive gas creation values, the ignition characteristics, and so forth. There is no way to translate a double-based powder performance into a single-based powder performance level with any accuracy"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wedgy, post: 1150818, member: 64108"] The Graf & Son's chart has rl25 faster than H1000 [URL]https://www.grafs.com/catalog/tech-resource/technicalResourceId/14/productId/162[/URL] or better yet an explanation of why the burn rates aren't really accurate [url=http://www.chuckhawks.com/powder_burn_rate.htm]Why Burn Rate Is Meaningless[/url] "Burn rate/Relative quickness does not tell use the physical shape of a powder, its composition, or the types of coatings. It cannot tell us whether a powder is single-based, double based, or triple based. It does not tell us the heat of explosion, the progressive / degressive gas creation values, the ignition characteristics, and so forth. There is no way to translate a double-based powder performance into a single-based powder performance level with any accuracy" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
burn rate charts
Top