Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
bullet weight or length more important to consistency.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gohring3006" data-source="post: 1449634" data-attributes="member: 78762"><p>In a perfect world both should be held to a absolute minimum.</p><p>But length is more important to me. The small variation in weight, doesn't reflect as much with the chrony, but length has showed up on target at long range. This is all compounded when other factors are thrown in, like variations in case capacity and inconsistent neck tension. In other words, getting all variables as consistent as possible is what I do. Because fixing one and not the others, quickly cancels out all your hard work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gohring3006, post: 1449634, member: 78762"] In a perfect world both should be held to a absolute minimum. But length is more important to me. The small variation in weight, doesn’t reflect as much with the chrony, but length has showed up on target at long range. This is all compounded when other factors are thrown in, like variations in case capacity and inconsistent neck tension. In other words, getting all variables as consistent as possible is what I do. Because fixing one and not the others, quickly cancels out all your hard work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
bullet weight or length more important to consistency.
Top