Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet Variation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mtang45" data-source="post: 461061" data-attributes="member: 4224"><p>I'm working on a 7mm STW load for 180gr VLD Bergers and am trying to sort to eliminate as much variation as possible. I've sorted by weight, and right now I'm sorting again by the length of the bearing surface. What other dimesions should I consider measuring? Total length? Base to ogive? Nose to ogive? Or other? A person could go crazy sorting out all the possible variables. </p><p></p><p>By the way the range I'm getting is .12mm total variation on the bearing surface, and .4gr total variation on the bullet weights. Does this sound excessive, normal or good?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mtang45, post: 461061, member: 4224"] I'm working on a 7mm STW load for 180gr VLD Bergers and am trying to sort to eliminate as much variation as possible. I've sorted by weight, and right now I'm sorting again by the length of the bearing surface. What other dimesions should I consider measuring? Total length? Base to ogive? Nose to ogive? Or other? A person could go crazy sorting out all the possible variables. By the way the range I'm getting is .12mm total variation on the bearing surface, and .4gr total variation on the bullet weights. Does this sound excessive, normal or good? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet Variation
Top