Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BULLET TEST COMPARISON (as promised)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 381010" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>I agree with the diameter thing. The smaller frontal area (lower sectional density) don't exert as much force at the same velocity. Thats why I felt the 200 gr. Nosler had a slight advantage over the lighter bullets of the same caliber when traveling at equal velocity. Thanks for the comment!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 381010, member: 13833"] I agree with the diameter thing. The smaller frontal area (lower sectional density) don't exert as much force at the same velocity. Thats why I felt the 200 gr. Nosler had a slight advantage over the lighter bullets of the same caliber when traveling at equal velocity. Thanks for the comment! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
BULLET TEST COMPARISON (as promised)
Top