Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet stabilization myth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derek M." data-source="post: 204386" data-attributes="member: 2693"><p>The issue Kirby brings up regarding the bullet spinning on its own center of gravity is something I heard in 1990 in Tucson at the range. That is why bullet concentricity is so important. It's also the reason I like Barnes bullets. I am inclined to believe that if there is one solid shank of metal (bullet), its center of gravity is truly its center point axis. </p><p></p><p>Not the best bullet for long range, but inside of 900 yards, they seem to kill game just fine. </p><p></p><p>Just an observation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derek M., post: 204386, member: 2693"] The issue Kirby brings up regarding the bullet spinning on its own center of gravity is something I heard in 1990 in Tucson at the range. That is why bullet concentricity is so important. It's also the reason I like Barnes bullets. I am inclined to believe that if there is one solid shank of metal (bullet), its center of gravity is truly its center point axis. Not the best bullet for long range, but inside of 900 yards, they seem to kill game just fine. Just an observation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Bullet stabilization myth?
Top