Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet bearing surface question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Forester" data-source="post: 231751" data-attributes="member: 11102"><p>You make a pretty good argument, at least for what level of division would be a good idea. The OP said the extreme spread was .015" though not .005. Following your example that would be something around an inch (if the change is linear and not somehow exponential?) at 1000. I guess everyone can decide for themselves if that matters in their application.</p><p></p><p>For myself, I do it because it is easy, does not cost anything, and I am already doing nearly everything else I can reasonably do to improve my reloads so why not?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Forester, post: 231751, member: 11102"] You make a pretty good argument, at least for what level of division would be a good idea. The OP said the extreme spread was .015" though not .005. Following your example that would be something around an inch (if the change is linear and not somehow exponential?) at 1000. I guess everyone can decide for themselves if that matters in their application. For myself, I do it because it is easy, does not cost anything, and I am already doing nearly everything else I can reasonably do to improve my reloads so why not? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet bearing surface question
Top