Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Best Ideas for Accuracy - FRH vs. SRM type hunters explain their techniques details.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darryl Cassel" data-source="post: 4011" data-attributes="member: 34"><p>Hey Brent</p><p></p><p>To sum this up, more then "two" spotters has "NEVER" been needed, even at extreme longrange. We can be on after two spotters with the optics we have to watch bullet impact.</p><p>That's all I was trying to explain to you.</p><p></p><p>I did talk to one LR group this year in PA and they said the deep snow was hiding the bullet impact and they could'nt see the hits at 1800 yards. They gave up on the buck they were after because in their situation and terrane, a spotter was not possible under the conditions. I would have done the same thing if I could not see a hit on a far off object. I would not have wanted to wound that animal and have it get away. </p><p></p><p>"You" also bring up a very good point. If you think that more then one or two spotters would be needed to accurately place a bullet in the target area, how would anyone think that a first round hit at extreme longrange (1500 plus) is going to be more accurate and a better way?</p><p></p><p>Have a good one.</p><p>DC <img src="http://images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>[ 01-20-2003: Message edited by: Darryl Cassel ]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darryl Cassel, post: 4011, member: 34"] Hey Brent To sum this up, more then "two" spotters has "NEVER" been needed, even at extreme longrange. We can be on after two spotters with the optics we have to watch bullet impact. That's all I was trying to explain to you. I did talk to one LR group this year in PA and they said the deep snow was hiding the bullet impact and they could'nt see the hits at 1800 yards. They gave up on the buck they were after because in their situation and terrane, a spotter was not possible under the conditions. I would have done the same thing if I could not see a hit on a far off object. I would not have wanted to wound that animal and have it get away. "You" also bring up a very good point. If you think that more then one or two spotters would be needed to accurately place a bullet in the target area, how would anyone think that a first round hit at extreme longrange (1500 plus) is going to be more accurate and a better way? Have a good one. DC [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [ 01-20-2003: Message edited by: Darryl Cassel ] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Best Ideas for Accuracy - FRH vs. SRM type hunters explain their techniques details.
Top