Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Best bang for the buck scope.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pyroducksx3" data-source="post: 492983" data-attributes="member: 20443"><p>IPHY is your scope adjustments and the value for adjustments will be in inches per hundred yards vs MOA which is Minute of angle is 1.047. As I understand it if your adjustments are in IPHY and they are 1/4 per click at a hundred yards then 2 clicks at 100 yards would be 1/2 at 200 yards 2 click will be 1" adjustment. So if you have a drop chart and it says at 600 yards you need to adjust 60 inches, so at 600 yards 4 clicks is actually 6" so it will take 40 clicks to get 60in at 600 yards , I think this is how it works. Vs MOA where you look at your range card and it says 8.4 MOA you go to the scope and dia 8.4 MOA and shoot , becasue MOA is a variable value, 1 MOA at a 100 yards is 1" (actually 1.047) 2" at 200, 3" at 300. MOA just weems way easier for me. <strong>Im not 100% sure this is how IPHY works but from how I understand things this is how it operates. Hopefully someone will confirm or deny this! </strong>Also if you get an FFP (Leupold has one zeiss no) have the hashes on the reticle match your turret adjustments. that way all your data can bee the same. Vortex has a EBR MOA reticle with moa adjustment, illuminated reticle, zero stop That was my first choice but I just dont have the $$$ for it. I agree with you on the leupolds. I think they make fine scopes I have two of them, but I got them when I worked for outdoor stores and got them way under retail and at that price they were a good value. I also have a bushnell 4200 and Im less impresed with it, the vx-II is clearer and brighter than he bushnell 4200.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pyroducksx3, post: 492983, member: 20443"] IPHY is your scope adjustments and the value for adjustments will be in inches per hundred yards vs MOA which is Minute of angle is 1.047. As I understand it if your adjustments are in IPHY and they are 1/4 per click at a hundred yards then 2 clicks at 100 yards would be 1/2 at 200 yards 2 click will be 1" adjustment. So if you have a drop chart and it says at 600 yards you need to adjust 60 inches, so at 600 yards 4 clicks is actually 6" so it will take 40 clicks to get 60in at 600 yards , I think this is how it works. Vs MOA where you look at your range card and it says 8.4 MOA you go to the scope and dia 8.4 MOA and shoot , becasue MOA is a variable value, 1 MOA at a 100 yards is 1" (actually 1.047) 2" at 200, 3" at 300. MOA just weems way easier for me. [B]Im not 100% sure this is how IPHY works but from how I understand things this is how it operates. Hopefully someone will confirm or deny this! [/B]Also if you get an FFP (Leupold has one zeiss no) have the hashes on the reticle match your turret adjustments. that way all your data can bee the same. Vortex has a EBR MOA reticle with moa adjustment, illuminated reticle, zero stop That was my first choice but I just dont have the $$$ for it. I agree with you on the leupolds. I think they make fine scopes I have two of them, but I got them when I worked for outdoor stores and got them way under retail and at that price they were a good value. I also have a bushnell 4200 and Im less impresed with it, the vx-II is clearer and brighter than he bushnell 4200. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Best bang for the buck scope.
Top