Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger Bullet Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="royinidaho" data-source="post: 278686" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Kevin/Bryan,</p><p></p><p>I/we really appreciate your openness.</p><p></p><p>The more we know about the uniqueness of Bergers efforts the greater the confidence in product.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't have asked the question except for my efforts to come up with a 277 cal bullet worthy of the 270 Allen Magnum. A worthy bullet would be one w/a high bc and weight of 170 gr and above.</p><p></p><p>Eric has indicated that such a bullet is on the drawing board, probably just a smudge at the moment<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />, to follow after the 338 offering.</p><p></p><p>What I'm doing is reducing 168s, not so successfully, and the 180 Match, with a little better success.</p><p></p><p>I get some results that could have been caused by the core spinning within the jacket.</p><p></p><p>After I finally give up on this endeavor I may write a book on the different ways one can take a nearly perfect bullet and screw it up.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="royinidaho, post: 278686, member: 2011"] Kevin/Bryan, I/we really appreciate your openness. The more we know about the uniqueness of Bergers efforts the greater the confidence in product. I wouldn't have asked the question except for my efforts to come up with a 277 cal bullet worthy of the 270 Allen Magnum. A worthy bullet would be one w/a high bc and weight of 170 gr and above. Eric has indicated that such a bullet is on the drawing board, probably just a smudge at the moment:D, to follow after the 338 offering. What I'm doing is reducing 168s, not so successfully, and the 180 Match, with a little better success. I get some results that could have been caused by the core spinning within the jacket. After I finally give up on this endeavor I may write a book on the different ways one can take a nearly perfect bullet and screw it up.:rolleyes::D:rolleyes::D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger Bullet Question
Top