Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger bullet performance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MudRunner2005" data-source="post: 1005885" data-attributes="member: 12995"><p>If this is the case, then why are you posting anti-Berger bullet posts on an open forum?</p><p> </p><p>Not trying to sound like a dick, just saying that if you didn't witness it first-hand, and you weren't there, and you know absolutely nothing other than some story someone MIGHT have fudged the numbers a little (7 rounds into an elk sounds extremely exaggerated, unless it was a zombie elk and it took 7 rounds to hit the CNS), than it seems a little strange to me how you can call this conclusive evidence of the bullets failing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MudRunner2005, post: 1005885, member: 12995"] If this is the case, then why are you posting anti-Berger bullet posts on an open forum? Not trying to sound like a dick, just saying that if you didn't witness it first-hand, and you weren't there, and you know absolutely nothing other than some story someone MIGHT have fudged the numbers a little (7 rounds into an elk sounds extremely exaggerated, unless it was a zombie elk and it took 7 rounds to hit the CNS), than it seems a little strange to me how you can call this conclusive evidence of the bullets failing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Berger bullet performance
Top