Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics Programs (Web based & Downloadable)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="overbore" data-source="post: 141813" data-attributes="member: 2981"><p>Over on Benchrest forum, last week an aerospace rocket engineer ( there really are some of them ) posted his comments on the various ballisic programs. Of the thousands or so technical words used, here are the simple conclusions he reached: If the correct BC is used and ALL OF the atsmopheric conditions are entered ( hello Kestrel) , he has found Prof. Art Pesja's program to be the most accurate. </p><p> /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif Don't have dog in this fight but I do use Pesja myself. Overbore</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="overbore, post: 141813, member: 2981"] Over on Benchrest forum, last week an aerospace rocket engineer ( there really are some of them ) posted his comments on the various ballisic programs. Of the thousands or so technical words used, here are the simple conclusions he reached: If the correct BC is used and ALL OF the atsmopheric conditions are entered ( hello Kestrel) , he has found Prof. Art Pesja's program to be the most accurate. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] Don't have dog in this fight but I do use Pesja myself. Overbore [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics Programs (Web based & Downloadable)
Top