Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics beyond 2000 yds : do we need/trust them?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Eichele" data-source="post: 138973" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>Gustavo,</p><p></p><p>You never cease to amaze me! Very diplomatic</p><p></p><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p> we are just trying to make better ballistics and it's not easy sometimes.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ] </p><p></p><p>I am definatly on board with you there. I try to apply the things I have learned in to my software and it is apparent that you do too. An old rifle smith friend of mine once told me that "nothing ventured, nothing gained." How true that is, even if it does invite heated disscusions by those that dissagree. The fact that guys like you and I attempt such a feat even in the face of opposition makes me feel good. I had NO BODY to teach me visual basic code. I am self taught. Granted, my software isnt as proffesional looking as some, it has a practical real life use. As time and experiance goes on, it will improove, as will yours. I am proud to have the patience with computers, code, longrange shooting and the ability to put it together for a good use. To those that think this is all for profit, trust me on this: I have invested tens of thousands of $$ and countless hours of time behind the rifle and computer and made less than 2,000 bucks in the entire venture. This truly stems from the love I have for this sport and my software is for the benefit of the rest of the people out their that share the love and patience I have for this awesome sport. No doubt Gustavo, you will develop your version with the same fuel I have and with the same love and patience for this great sport! Hats off to you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Eichele, post: 138973, member: 1007"] Gustavo, You never cease to amaze me! Very diplomatic [ QUOTE ] we are just trying to make better ballistics and it's not easy sometimes. [/ QUOTE ] I am definatly on board with you there. I try to apply the things I have learned in to my software and it is apparent that you do too. An old rifle smith friend of mine once told me that "nothing ventured, nothing gained." How true that is, even if it does invite heated disscusions by those that dissagree. The fact that guys like you and I attempt such a feat even in the face of opposition makes me feel good. I had NO BODY to teach me visual basic code. I am self taught. Granted, my software isnt as proffesional looking as some, it has a practical real life use. As time and experiance goes on, it will improove, as will yours. I am proud to have the patience with computers, code, longrange shooting and the ability to put it together for a good use. To those that think this is all for profit, trust me on this: I have invested tens of thousands of $$ and countless hours of time behind the rifle and computer and made less than 2,000 bucks in the entire venture. This truly stems from the love I have for this sport and my software is for the benefit of the rest of the people out their that share the love and patience I have for this awesome sport. No doubt Gustavo, you will develop your version with the same fuel I have and with the same love and patience for this great sport! Hats off to you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Ballistics beyond 2000 yds : do we need/trust them?
Top