Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Are we too critical of modern bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 908169" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>WR, </p><p>Never said you weren't adept at the use of the language. I said I thought you were the one "picking nits", to use your own language. </p><p></p><p>But since you're sticking to your guns now for the 5th time (4 times with MC and the 5th time with me), would you clearly identify where MC wrote the equivalent of "bullet manufacturers don't test their bullets"? In ballistic gel, in animal carcasses, or in any other respect? MC responded to you directly after you leveled three allegations that he'd made such a statement. MC explained to you that he had not stated any such thing. You ignored his explanation of his own written text, and then continued to "pick nits" two more times. You're asking him to justify a statement that he never made, after he told you that he never made it. That's the definition of "picking nits".</p><p></p><p>Here we go, blow by blow. Please point out exactly were MC's text constitutes "bullet manufacturers don't test their products".</p><p></p><p></p><p><u>MC's initial Post that appears to have prompted your allegation</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p><u><strong>WR's 1st response</strong> - your initial allegation that MC stated "companies do not test their bullets in ballistic gel or on carcasses"</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p><u>MC's responds that you assumed incorrectly</u>: </p><p></p><p></p><p><u><strong>WR's 2nd request</strong> that MC explain himself regarding a statement that he in fact never made</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p><u><strong>WR's third challenge</strong>, after failing to elicit a response from MC with your 2nd request</u>:</p><p> </p><p></p><p><u>MC finally responds to your allegation (false to my mastery of the language) that he's "claimed manufacturers are not testing their bullets in ballistic gel or carcasses."</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p><u><strong>WR confronts MC for the 4th time</strong>, after MC has responded as clearly as the language can communicate that he "did not say the manufacturers are not testing"</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p><u>WR, to my understanding of the language, you provide this quote from MC to demonstrate your contention that MC stated something that he already told you he didn't say</u>:</p><p></p><p></p><p>So, if you'd indulge me - identify the MC text that communicated what you claimed he said - <strong>5 times</strong>. Specifically, that "<strong>manufacturers are not testing their bullets in ballistic gel or carcasses.</strong>"</p><p></p><p>And if you can't do that, could you answer the question - <em><u>What is it you're trying to accomplish</u></em>?" Are you trying to harass MC to the point of silencing his participation on the Forum?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 908169, member: 4191"] WR, Never said you weren't adept at the use of the language. I said I thought you were the one "picking nits", to use your own language. But since you're sticking to your guns now for the 5th time (4 times with MC and the 5th time with me), would you clearly identify where MC wrote the equivalent of "bullet manufacturers don't test their bullets"? In ballistic gel, in animal carcasses, or in any other respect? MC responded to you directly after you leveled three allegations that he'd made such a statement. MC explained to you that he had not stated any such thing. You ignored his explanation of his own written text, and then continued to "pick nits" two more times. You're asking him to justify a statement that he never made, after he told you that he never made it. That's the definition of "picking nits". Here we go, blow by blow. Please point out exactly were MC's text constitutes "bullet manufacturers don't test their products". [U]MC's initial Post that appears to have prompted your allegation[/U]: [U][B]WR's 1st response[/B] - your initial allegation that MC stated "companies do not test their bullets in ballistic gel or on carcasses"[/U]: [U]MC's responds that you assumed incorrectly[/U]: [U][B]WR's 2nd request[/B] that MC explain himself regarding a statement that he in fact never made[/U]: [U][B]WR's third challenge[/B], after failing to elicit a response from MC with your 2nd request[/U]: [U]MC finally responds to your allegation (false to my mastery of the language) that he's "claimed manufacturers are not testing their bullets in ballistic gel or carcasses."[/U]: [U][B]WR confronts MC for the 4th time[/B], after MC has responded as clearly as the language can communicate that he "did not say the manufacturers are not testing"[/U]: [U]WR, to my understanding of the language, you provide this quote from MC to demonstrate your contention that MC stated something that he already told you he didn't say[/U]: So, if you'd indulge me - identify the MC text that communicated what you claimed he said - [B]5 times[/B]. Specifically, that "[B]manufacturers are not testing their bullets in ballistic gel or carcasses.[/B]" And if you can't do that, could you answer the question - [I][U]What is it you're trying to accomplish[/U][/I]?" Are you trying to harass MC to the point of silencing his participation on the Forum? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Are we too critical of modern bullets?
Top