APS 338 Raptor, R&D early results

Your 338 Raptor sounds and looks very impressive, kudos on the great work you are doing.

I have a little experience with RL 33 as I have been doing some testing with it in the 338 LM you built for me and at similar pressures I'm getting close to 100 fps higher velocity over Retumbo using 8 grs more powder.
91grs of Retumbo gets me 2780 fps and 99grs of RL 33 is 2878 fps with the 300gr Berger Hybrid.
I haven't had the chance to figure out anything about temp sensitivity yet as I just started testing but hope to see how it performs this winter compared to the 90+ temps now.
 
Kirby,

Quick Load lists the burn rate of powders. Below are the default values from QL for several powders that were mentioned in this thread. This burn rate is determined by testing. Of course, burn rate varies from lot to lot but should be in this general neighborhood. As you can see RL33 is slower than most. It also has the added advantage of a burn rate control agent impregnated into the powder granules like RL17. I'm running 99.0 grains behind a 200 gr Accubond at 3,150 fps in my 300 RUM with no pressure signs. Still waiting for the 210 Accubond Long Ranges to show up.

By the way Ramshot Magnum is a ball powder that is relatively temp stable. There is test data on Barnes' website showing this which I have confirmed with my own testing in 338 RUM.

Relative powder burn rates from QL:
H4831 0.4301
H1000 0.3660
Retumbo 0.3370
Magnum 0.3250
N570 0.2770
H870 0.2750
US869 0.2735
H50BMG 0.2705
RL33 0.2700
20N29 0.2400
RL50 0.2170

Very interesting but I can tell you for a fact that many of the powders in that list are out of order, at least from the lots I have in shop. Magnum is not slower then Retumbo in my testing and US869 is significantly slower then H50BMG and RL50 seems to be right between those two.

Now lot to lot variations certainly exist and burn rate can be dependent on the chambering your shooting them in so these lists are pretty fluid but does show some promise.

THanks for the info.
 
Your 338 Raptor sounds and looks very impressive, kudos on the great work you are doing.

I have a little experience with RL 33 as I have been doing some testing with it in the 338 LM you built for me and at similar pressures I'm getting close to 100 fps higher velocity over Retumbo using 8 grs more powder.
91grs of Retumbo gets me 2780 fps and 99grs of RL 33 is 2878 fps with the 300gr Berger Hybrid.
I haven't had the chance to figure out anything about temp sensitivity yet as I just started testing but hope to see how it performs this winter compared to the 90+ temps now.

Thanks for the information, I will be burning some RL33 just to see what happens in my Raptor as well as my 338 AX.
 
Kirby, I'm looking forward to you testing the RL 33.

My results have shown it is closer to RL50 than Retumbo, if not it is right betweeen.

As I mentioned earlier RL33 really perked up my 338 Terminator, it is a smaller case than the Raptor by about 20 grains of water so as you say it may be too fast for the Raptor, time will tell :)

Ya, I need to burn some and just see what happens. Nothing else, may be a boost for the performance of the 338 AX.

Thanks for your info!
 
Kirby, Could you remind us again about the Raptor case design and the thought processes regarding it's design? This is a completely new case designed by you, right?
 
Did not get any pics taken today, to busy with other projects but will get them.

About the 300 and 338 Raptor case design.

Originally, I used the 338 Excalibur case for the bases of both of these new wildcats and they did work very well. Jamison was the only maker of Excalibur brass that was somewhat affordable(+$4 ea.) and could handle a decent amount of chamber pressure.

Right after I got the reamers all finalized and load and ballistic testing done, Jamison international close its doors........ No brass available other then the A-square Excalibur brass which did not have the best reputation for strength of quality.

So, after all that work and money invested, the 300 and 338 Raptor projects were pretty much a dead stick.

A few months after this, I was talking with Joel Russo and he was telling me about some brass that Bertram had made for Bruce Baer for his 338 Big Baer and he had said how impressed he was with the brass and in working with Bertram. So I got ahold of Bruce Bertram and told him what I had in mind. We discussed the Excalibur case design briefly but I decided that if I was going to have brass made, why not just go with the Lapua diameter case instead of the slightly smaller diameter Excalibur case.

Bertram agreed that it would be easier as he could use body dies that he already had to keep cost down a bit. Now it I had to decide on case length. I wanted a longer case then the Lapua for sure but did not want just a non belted version of the 378 Wby case.

I set down and drew up a reamer print with what I thought would be perfect dimensions for the Raptors.

Basically, its a unique case design. Only thing similar with current case designs is the head diameter and rim diameter which are the same as the 338 Lapua. I decided that if I was going to do this we might as well go all out so I set the case OAL to 3.050" which is slightly longer then my 338 Allen Magnum.

The case body length is slightly longer then that of the 338 AM by design. This is so that there would be no chance that a 338 Raptor could chamber in a 338 AM rifle as that would be a very dangerous situation if that was possible. Again, the shoulder on the Raptor is about 70 thou farther forward compared to the 338 AM. So basically its a 338 Lapua case that has been stretched to a length of 3.050".

neck length is just shy of 0.300" which is plenty for a round designed for strictly a single shot rifle. Shoulder and case body specs are same as all my other APS wildcats. Throat length is set so that the 300 gr Berger Hybrid or OTM is seated with the full diameter bullet base seated to the base of the case neck for an OAL of 4.340" seated to the lands.

The leade is a conventional design with 1-0-0 angle, shallow but pretty standard by todays magnum throat designs. Same throat angle as is used by Remington in the RUM chamberings. Conventional leade angle is 1-30-0 so its a bit shallower to help flatten the pressure spike a bit but nothing unconventional in design.

Capacity is a tick over half way between the 338 Allen Xpress (338 Lapua Imrpoved) and the 338 Allen Magnum (338-408 Cheytac improved).

Conventional velocity standards for a 338 Lapua Improved in a 30" barrel with a 300 gr Berger is around 3000 fps. Standard velocity for the 338 AM out of a 32" barrel length is 3300 fps so my goal is 3150 fps which is appearing to be practical.

I will try to get some visual aids tomorrow to show examples.
 
Some quick pics.

DSC00547_zps38b63df2.jpg

300 Win Mag on left, 338 Raptor on right.

DSC00545_zps39d46dfb.jpg

300 RUM on left, 338 Raptor on right

DSC00544_zpsb6bb8a89.jpg

338 Lapua on left, 338 Raptor middle and 338 Allen Xpress on the right. when loaded with 300 gr Berger in each and all in 30" barrel, you will see roughly 2850 fps, 3150 fps and 3000 fps respectively. Again, these are averages from what I have seen so far. Some will be slightly faster, some slightly slower but this is pretty average.
 
Well, I was able to get a small supply of RL33 from a very gracious fellow member of LRH.com that live near Bozeman. To him I say thank you very much for your help with this testing.

I wanted to see what the 338 Raptor would do with RL33. In my gut I felt this powder was to fast in burn rate but sometimes you get surprised so wanted to prove it to myself before I made any opinions. While I felt RL33 may be magical in my 338 Allen Xpress and other 338 Lapua Improved designs, the Raptor has a 10-15 grain larger usible powder charge range so felt it may be just a bit to large to be right for RL33. Only one way to find out though, get some bullets in the air.

Using the 300 gr Berger Hybid seated to 4.320" OAL and lit off with a Fed-215 primer. I started at 106.0 gr which was a very low starting point but wanted to make sure I was safe as I have had NO experience with this powder. This was in fact a very mild powder charge producing only 2789 fps. I say only but we were already at 338 Lapua performance levels!!! :D

Seeing this, I jumped up 4 grains to 110.0 gr charge and this time only got 2812 fps, when you go up 4 grains and only increase 23 fps, you know your running VERY low pressures in a large capacity case!!!

Increased another 4 grains to 114.0 gr and it was obvious that finally the pressures were starting to build getting some work done with a velocity of 2904 fps. From here out, I increased two grains at a time until I got the first hint of an ejector ring on the case head.

114.0 gr.............................2904 fps
116.0 gr.............................2956 fps
118.0 gr.............................3016 fps
120.0 gr.............................3065 fps
122.0 gr.............................3129 fps
124.0 gr.............................3182 fps Slight hint of ejector ring on case head

I could have increased powder charge more but in working with this new case, once you get to the level that you start to see a very faint ejector ring, your at the max working load. Another grain of powder may have been just fine, another two grains would have started to noticeably loosen the primer pocket so why waste brass. For RL33, in this 29" barreled 338 Raptor, 3182 fps is my max working load. Not 3200 fps but for all intent and purpose, same thing.

After this test, I set back and reviewed all the velocity test data and tried to determine what I felt was the best all around load that I wanted to test at long range for an accuracy test of the rifle. The criteria for the best all around load must have the following:

1. Pressures comfortable enough to allow +8 firings per case
2. Consistent velocities
3. High load density

In looking over all the load data from the tests using WC860, US869, H-50BMG, RL50 and RL33, I came to the conclusion that the load using 127.0 gr of RL50 was the best all around load. In early testing, it showed very comfortable pressures an average velocity roughly 3150 fps. This was 50 fps off the max load using this powder and had a load density of roughly 98%.

The RL33 loads were quite good but the load densities were a bit lower then I like.

The US869 loads produced significantly more velocity well over 3200 fps but velocity spreads were a bit higher then the RL50 loads and there is no meaningful difference at long range between 3150 fps and 3200 fps so I went with the tighter velocity spreads.

I did however want to prove the +8 firings per case requirement so to do so, I picked out the case from this batch of test cases that had the highest pressure test load from the RL33 test loads, this was basically a 3200 fps level load. This case had a slight ejector head on the case. Why not start with a virgin case, could have and would have been a more accurate indicator of the brass life using my chosen load but I figured I would pick a case that had already had a high pressure loading on it and if that case could still get me 8 firings, I would know that all the virgin cases would easily make it past 8 firings per case.

So, I FL sized this one case, trimmed it to length and deburred it. Seated a Fed-215 primer, threw in 127.0 gr of RL50, seated the berger 300 gr to 4.320" and shot it over the chrono.

The first firing on this case had produced 3182 fps, that was using RL33.

The second firing with the RL50 load clocked 3148 fps. After each firing, I would FL resize the case, reprime, repowder, seat bullet and fire again. I would repeat this until I either found the primer pocket was to loose to hold a primer without gas leaking or I reached the acceptable number of firings.

Firing #3...........3151 fps Primer pocket tightness unchanged

Firing #4...........3152 fps Primer pocket very slightly looser

Firing #5...........3183 fps Primer pocket remained similar to previous.
-Case length had increase slightly and needed to be trimmed which I am sure was the result of the increase in pressure as it had slightly contacted the end of the chamber neck.
-Trimmed case back to original length

Firing #6............3159 fps Primer pocket slightly looser but still plenty of resistance when seating primer.
** Case neck no longer expanding to allow bullet to freely pass through fired case neck. ANNEALED CASE NECK after 6th firing.

Firing #7............3173 fps Primer pocket remained similar to #6 firing

Firing #8............3167 fps Primer pocket slightly looser but still solidly holding primer. No gas leakage of any kind.
-Trimmed case to original length
-Needed to bump shoulder an additional 3 thou for proper chambering with no resistance, important for a case of this diameter and especially length.

Firing #9............3167 fps Primer pocket pretty loose but still solidly holding primer and no gas leakage of any kind

Firing #10..........3159 fps Primer pocket loose but again, no gas leakage of any kind.

Full Length sized the case, reprimed it and trimmed it. Put it back in the ammo box and have no worries about getting at least 1-2 more firings off this case.

The average velocity for all 9 firings with this powder charge was 3162 fps with an extreme spread of 35 fps. That was including the high velocity reading of 3183 fps which I am sure was caused by the case mouth contacting the end of the chamber. If you take that one high firing out of the string, the ES was 25 fps. Not to bad for basically a 10 shot string and plenty consistant for anything I will ever do with the rifle, including 2000 yard class shooting.

Every firing on this case left a faint ejector ring. No shiny ring, just a faint compression ring similar to what you see on factory 300 RUM brass. This brass is not as strong as Lapua brand 338 Lapua brass, not nearly as hard in the case head. It seems to be very similar to Remington RUM brass or Norma brand 338 Lapua brass with a faint ejector ring showing up at between 65,000 and 68,000 psi.

So, with this load which averaged 3162 fps and allowed +10 firings per case, it easily covers my criteria for an all around great load. Had I started from a virgin case, I am sure that this case would have held TIGHT primer pockets for several more firings. By the end of this case life test, the primer pocket was very loose but again, there as no gas leakage of any kind and I could not push out the seated primer using hand pressure and a small diameter steel punch pushed through the case mouth. Using this load, 100 round of brass would likely offer at least 1200 rounds down the barrel, possibly more.

I do not what anyone reading this to think that these primer pockets are holding virgin tight for +10 firings, that is certainly not the case, what I am saying is that the primer pocket is staying plenty tight to securely hold a primer for +10 firings with no gas leakage of any kind. That is 100% acceptable for me and showed no sign of any dangerous situation.

Once the case reached the 6th firing, the primer pocket tightness seemed to pretty much stabilize and remain very similar through out the rest of the test. While the primer pocket continued to loosen as more shots were fired on the case, the difference from firing to firing were very slight and again, when the case was done with this torture test, it was reprepped and the entire batch of 50 rounds of brass were loaded up with this load and I have no worries about getting at least 1-2 more firings on this case.

Next up is accuracy testing.

One thing I did notice was that with the virgin brass, neck run outs were a bit larger then I like to see. On once fired cases, the neck run out really tightened up well and as such bullet run out also improved dramatically so we will see how this shows up down range. The throat on my Raptor chamber is very tight, only 1/2 thou over nominal bullet diameter so that will correct some of this bullet run out on virgin cases but I am sure accuracy will improve notically on the second firing on these cases but that is not unusual for any brass.

We will see how the bullets fly and how close they land!!!
 
Cool Kirby, glad we all got to see how the RL33 did!

Out of curiosity, what was the load density @ 124 gr? Sounds like 33 was a bit too dense (and it is a dense powder) for the Raptor case. But, that density might prove to be a good boost in your 338 AX.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for testing RL33 & posting the data Kirby.

I thought as you did, it may have been slightly too fast for your case, but as you said, unless you test it you don't know :)
 
Cool Kirby, glad we all got to see how the RL33 did!

Out of curiosity, what was the load density @ 124 gr? Sounds like 33 was a bit too dense (and it is a dense powder) for the Raptor case. But, that density might prove to be a good boost in your 338 AX.

Load density at 124.0 gr with the 300 gr berger and this 4.320" OAL is right around 95%. Perfectly acceptable and likely a very good load. I can not say this RL50 load is a BETTER load but it does have a bit higher load density and it looks to be around 20-30 fps more velocity with same or slightly less pressure.

The main factor in using the RL50 load at this time is I have 16 lbs of RL50 and only about 1/2 lb left of RL33 after testing it in the 338 Raptor and doing a quick velocity test in one of my customers 338 AX rifles (will post on those results on a different topic post). I want to use the remaining RL33 to see what it will do in my 7mm Allen Magnum and 300 Allen Xpress.

Currently I am using Retumbo in my 7mm AM with 160, 175 and 180 gr bullet weights. It works very well but the slightly slower burning RL33 may give us a decent boost in that one as well. With the 230 gr Bergers and 240 gr SMK in my 300 AX, I think RL33 maybe even better in that chambering then the 338 AX which it was very good in.

I do not think RL is to dense for the 338 Raptor, a bit on the fast side for burn rate as you could pressure out pretty easily if you were not paying attention but I think it would be quite easy to make a very good, high performance load in the 3125-3150 fps range with RL33 in the Raptor. Same pressures with RL50 will just get you into that 3150-3175 fps range and again, Ihave a lot of it on hand.
 
Thanks for testing RL33 & posting the data Kirby.

I thought as you did, it may have been slightly too fast for your case, but as you said, unless you test it you don't know :)

Ya I think its slightly faster then what would be perfect for the 338 Raptor at least with 300 gr bullet weights. I think with a 250 or 265 gr it may be nearly perfect but in this big of a 338, I do not think dropping much below 265 gr would make much sense.

It certainly works in the Raptor so its another good option. I think you can get more velocity with other powders with same pressure but that certainly does not mean its not a perfectly viable powder choice in the Raptor. Good to have another option.

It showed better results in the 338 Allen Xpress.
 
Kirby, would you mind putting a link in this thread to the 338AX/RL33 topic that you plan to start? I think quite a few folks are waiting to see those results as well...
 
Load density at 124.0 gr with the 300 gr berger and this 4.320" OAL is right around 95%. Perfectly acceptable and likely a very good load. I can not say this RL50 load is a BETTER load but it does have a bit higher load density and it looks to be around 20-30 fps more velocity with same or slightly less pressure.

The main factor in using the RL50 load at this time is I have 16 lbs of RL50 and only about 1/2 lb left of RL33 after testing it in the 338 Raptor and doing a quick velocity test in one of my customers 338 AX rifles (will post on those results on a different topic post). I want to use the remaining RL33 to see what it will do in my 7mm Allen Magnum and 300 Allen Xpress.

Currently I am using Retumbo in my 7mm AM with 160, 175 and 180 gr bullet weights. It works very well but the slightly slower burning RL33 may give us a decent boost in that one as well. With the 230 gr Bergers and 240 gr SMK in my 300 AX, I think RL33 maybe even better in that chambering then the 338 AX which it was very good in.

I do not think RL is to dense for the 338 Raptor, a bit on the fast side for burn rate as you could pressure out pretty easily if you were not paying attention but I think it would be quite easy to make a very good, high performance load in the 3125-3150 fps range with RL33 in the Raptor. Same pressures with RL50 will just get you into that 3150-3175 fps range and again, Ihave a lot of it on hand.

I would at least say that RL50 "appears" to be a "better" load because of velocity and load density. It's hard to argue with that. If RL33 was more accurate, then you might say it was the better, but I don't see why it would be any more accurate than 50 unless it was the personality of the rifle. I would think the more dense RL50 load would be a tad more consistent overall. At least you now know where it stands :)

Am looking forward to the results in the 338 AX. Alliant says it was developed for the 338 LM
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top