Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Anyone try staball 6.5 in a .270 win yet?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 1856644" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>Interesting, thanks. I assume by the burn rate it's more appropriate with heavier slugs but can't argue with accuracy and acceptable if not top end velocity. Loving all these new temp insensitive copper eating double base powders lately. Time will tell if they are as consistent and dependable as the equally beloved old school Hodgdon/imr single base propellants (long live the 4064 4350 4831 7828 quadrilateral of perfection!) There's fun to be had in figuring that out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 1856644, member: 109862"] Interesting, thanks. I assume by the burn rate it’s more appropriate with heavier slugs but can’t argue with accuracy and acceptable if not top end velocity. Loving all these new temp insensitive copper eating double base powders lately. Time will tell if they are as consistent and dependable as the equally beloved old school Hodgdon/imr single base propellants (long live the 4064 4350 4831 7828 quadrilateral of perfection!) There’s fun to be had in figuring that out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Anyone try staball 6.5 in a .270 win yet?
Top