Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Anybody want to discuss this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buffalobob" data-source="post: 104215" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>Somewhere in my computer a few month I wrote up a long discussion on this and then decided not to post it because it was so negative.</p><p></p><p>JD hits the same points in only a few sentences. Being as Alabama lost in the second round I guess I have some time. The Weatherby double radius is simply a venturi orifice. It has less pressure loss than the regular angled shoulder cartridges if the distance from the shoulder to the neck is the same. Burning powder and gas will flow smoother through the curved constriction than the sharp angled constriction. You can check any hydraulic pipe fitting manual on pressure headloss. Check thehead loss of flow meters in a irrigation system. Same thing goes for air flow if you should happen to have any mechanical engineering references around. Out in the field you will see Parchal and Palmer Bowles and verturi flumes for measuring irrigation water although simple wiers are the most common. In any event it does not matter what kind of flow you are measureing the curved "appraoch" to the constriction is best for reducing headloss.</p><p></p><p>I am sure the reason the the case in question has only one shoulder curve is because Weatherby has patented the double curve. A case where half a$$ed is only half as good as full a$$ed. A little funny joke there being as I like Wbys.</p><p></p><p>So what has the guy invented - a runty half a$$ed Wby. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Now then what does it all mean. Not much is my opinion. I think the guy was bored and decided that here was something that nobody else had done and he did it. Now all that is left is for somebody else to take a case and have the first approach constriction angled and the junction with the neck radiussed. The minor reduction of inside case pressure is not really going to reduce case stretching very much and all this about sparks flying around inside the case ignores the basic principles of the physical universe. Two pieces of matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time and you cannot make sparks and presusre waves fly through a case that is full of powder and focus in the neck. </p><p></p><p></p><p>If this response insults anybody I will be happy to delete it. I try not to post very many "negative remarks" and that is why I never posted my thought before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buffalobob, post: 104215, member: 8"] Somewhere in my computer a few month I wrote up a long discussion on this and then decided not to post it because it was so negative. JD hits the same points in only a few sentences. Being as Alabama lost in the second round I guess I have some time. The Weatherby double radius is simply a venturi orifice. It has less pressure loss than the regular angled shoulder cartridges if the distance from the shoulder to the neck is the same. Burning powder and gas will flow smoother through the curved constriction than the sharp angled constriction. You can check any hydraulic pipe fitting manual on pressure headloss. Check thehead loss of flow meters in a irrigation system. Same thing goes for air flow if you should happen to have any mechanical engineering references around. Out in the field you will see Parchal and Palmer Bowles and verturi flumes for measuring irrigation water although simple wiers are the most common. In any event it does not matter what kind of flow you are measureing the curved "appraoch" to the constriction is best for reducing headloss. I am sure the reason the the case in question has only one shoulder curve is because Weatherby has patented the double curve. A case where half a$$ed is only half as good as full a$$ed. A little funny joke there being as I like Wbys. So what has the guy invented - a runty half a$$ed Wby. Now then what does it all mean. Not much is my opinion. I think the guy was bored and decided that here was something that nobody else had done and he did it. Now all that is left is for somebody else to take a case and have the first approach constriction angled and the junction with the neck radiussed. The minor reduction of inside case pressure is not really going to reduce case stretching very much and all this about sparks flying around inside the case ignores the basic principles of the physical universe. Two pieces of matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time and you cannot make sparks and presusre waves fly through a case that is full of powder and focus in the neck. If this response insults anybody I will be happy to delete it. I try not to post very many "negative remarks" and that is why I never posted my thought before. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Anybody want to discuss this?
Top