Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Anybody calculated AccuBond B.C?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Eichele" data-source="post: 170074" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>Steve,</p><p></p><p>I have never shot the 162 AMAX but I have worked with the 155 and 178 AMAX's and have results that were either only slightly lower than advertised or much better. I have shot the 155 as high as .474 and it is advertised at .460 I think. The lowest I have seen for the 178 was .490 and it is advertised at .495. I think you will find the AMAX line to be close whether it be a bit higher or a bit lower. Regardless, the 162 will be better than most 7mm bullets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Eichele, post: 170074, member: 1007"] Steve, I have never shot the 162 AMAX but I have worked with the 155 and 178 AMAX's and have results that were either only slightly lower than advertised or much better. I have shot the 155 as high as .474 and it is advertised at .460 I think. The lowest I have seen for the 178 was .490 and it is advertised at .495. I think you will find the AMAX line to be close whether it be a bit higher or a bit lower. Regardless, the 162 will be better than most 7mm bullets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Anybody calculated AccuBond B.C?
Top